Previously, creating a declaration with Fir2IrCallableDeclarationsGenerator/
Fir2IrClassifiersGenerator didn't guarantee that this declaration will
be actually added to the list of parent class/file declarations, which
lead to situations when FIR2IR created some declarations in the air
(mostly fake-overrides)
It's effectively a breaking change (^KT-62558)
K2 assigns flexible type to all static fields (from Java) and, for example,
`String? becomes String unlike K1. It affects IR signature generating.
That's why signature dump is disabled for some tests.
^KT-57811 Fixed
^KT-61786 Fixed
Previously fir2ir created real IR properties some getter and setter for
such references, which lead to the situation that there might be a
unbound fake override for synthetic property which wasn't stored in
declaration storage (and code in FakeOverrideGenerator was a hack
to cover this case)
In the same time K1 creates fake property for such cases, which is stored
in IrPropertyReference along with original get... and set... functions
as getter and setter of reference. And in this commit K2 does the same thing
^KT-61637
If some function is not fake-override, then its type should be just
default type of containing class
For fake overrides the default type calculated in the following way:
1. Find first overridden function, which is not fake override
2. Take its containing class
3. Find supertype of current containing class with type constructor of
class from step 2
^KT-60252 Fixed
This allows us to properly complete array literals arguments of
annotation calls fixing several false-negative type mismatch errors
as well as enabling the inference of generic type arguments.
#KT-59581 Fixed
#KT-58883 Fixed
In this commit we have a lot of change in test data. This was caused
by the way where we evaluate constants. We split constant evaluation
into two distinct parts: only necessary evaluations for `fir2ir`
(like const val and annotations) and optimizations for lowering.
Now we don't do all constant evaluation on `fir2ir`, but IR
dump is executed after this phase, so test data changed.
#KT-58923
Generating IR declarations for use-site substitution overrides leads
to IR that is different from K1 as well as problems in signature
generation which relies on mangling. Use-site substitutions can contain
references to type parameters from the call-site which aren't handled
in mangling.
#KT-57022 Fixed
This only applies to JVM and fq-names in declaration references
in IR dumps.
This enables us to run more irText tests on platforms other than JVM
(see KT-58605).
This doesn't reduce the quality of tests, because the flags are still
printed for declarations themselves. We only omit them in references.
However, this makes the tests more compatible with non-JVM backends
(see KT-58605), because flags of referenced stdlib declarations may
differ among target platforms.
Previously, the semantic was more-or-less correct for most of the cases
but some corner one, like `sort` in MutableList didn't work properly.
Namely, `sort` should be marked there in a way to forbid to call it
everywhere beside super-calls.
Also, overriding it should be allowed.
Mostly, the logic was re-written to K2 model from K1-related
JvmBuiltInsCustomizer.
^KT-57694 In progress
^KT-57269 Fixed
For type parameters of generic properties,
`DeclarationDescriptor#getContainingDeclaration` must return
the property descriptor instead of the accessor function descriptor.
^KT-57436 Fixed
- Mangled names of property accessors now include context receiver
types of the corresponding property when computed from FIR.
- Context receivers are now supported when computing mangled names
from IR
- IrBasedDescriptors now account for context receivers
^KT-57435 Fixed
The reason #1 for this feature is that we want to test IdSignatures
generated for declarations. Currently, there is no (easy) way to ensure
that a change in the signature building logic doesn't cause any breaking
changes wrt klibs.
Now, most IdSignatures include hashed mangled names in them, so even if
we catch a regression where the included hash changes, there would be no
way of knowing immediately what caused it, unless we'd also have mangled
names in the expectations.
The reason #2 is to test the manglers themselves. Currently, there are
no tests for them. They heavily duplicate each other, this is already
causing issues (see KT-57427) that would be very hard to catch without
these tests.
^KT-58238 Fixed
The changes to the irText test data result in the fact that we
now unconditionally unwrap substitution overrides of delegation targets
whereas before we built an unsubstituted scope of the type we delegate
to. If we delegate to a class A : B<C>, the unsubstituted scope of
A can still contain substitution overrides for inherited generic methods
from B<T> that we didn't unwrap before but do unwrap now.
#KT-57899 Fixed
Mikhail Glukhikh