Supported:
- conversion in resolution parts. Also sam-with-receiver is supported automatically
- separate flag for kotlin function with java SAM as parameters
TODO:
- fix overload conflict error when function type is the same byte origin types is ordered
- consider case when parameter type is T, T <:> Runnable
- support vararg of Runnable
[NI] Turn off synthetic scope with SAM adapter functions if NI enabled
Such test has no ense in NI because NI it is LV = 1.4 and we cannot
repeat behaviour in 1.3 anyway, so I propose not even support old cases.
Also priority of LANGUAGE directive should be more then key enabled on
all tests -- also fixed.
For example, if a class is `@SinceKotlin("X")
@WasExperimental(M::class)`, then its constructor should also be
accessible if API < X, provided that the opt-in to M is given
This can happen e.g. if all supertypes were on the cycle (A : B, B : A)
-- then SupertypesLoopChecker will cut all supertypes that are on cycle,
leaving set of supertypes empty.
Some clients in the compiler are not ready to work with empty list of
supertypes -- notably, CommonSupertypes.
^KT-23029 Fixed
#KT-21696 Fixed
The problem is coming from the fact that `AnnotationTarget.VALUE_PARAMETER` is mapped to receiver parameter and to value parameter, but annotation with use-site target `receiver` can be used only on type reference of receiver parameter
Fixes #KT-23153 for Kotlin 1.3
The problem was in the type check of expression type against expected type. When feature `AssigningArraysToVarargsInNamedFormInAnnotations` (KT-20171) appeared, expected type could be wrong, which led to failed type check
Note, that this change potentially has some other effects in corner cases
(like the changed test data that is rather sensible because `bar`
in the example is not effectively projected out and can be called
with nulls)
Probably, we need to consider rewriting all other isSomeType methods
in KotlinBuiltins, but now it seems to be a rather dangerous change
#KT-16424 Fixed
Introdude deprecation as per KT-21515. Warning is reported on type
usage, that soon will became invisible. Quickfix by adding explicit
import is added.
Idea behind implementation is to mark scopes that are deprecated (see
ClassResolutionScopesSupport).
Then, during walk along hierarchy of scopes, look at deprecation status
of the scope that has provided this classifier.
Note that we also have to check if there are *some* non-deprecated
visibility paths (because we can see classifier by two paths, e.g. if
we've added explicit import) -- then this type reference shouldn't be
treated as deprecated.
In an open expected class inheriting an expected interface, abstract
members are now inherited as _open_ fake overrides, not final. Final was
technically safer but also stricter and thus could be unexpected by the
user. In a final class, abstract members are still inherited as _final_
fake overrides. So, the general rule is now the following: the modality
of an expected fake override, which overrides only abstract members, in
a non-abstract class is equal to the modality of that class
#KT-22031 Fixed
Fake overrides for abstract members from expected classes should become
non-abstract (final, in fact) in non-abstract expected subclasses
#KT-22031 Fixed
When a parameter has a default argument value both in the expected
annotation and in the actual annotation, they must be equal. This check
has been only implemented for the case when actual annotation is Kotlin
source code, and NOT a Java class coming from an actual typealias. The
latter case would require a bit more work in passing a platform-specific
annotation-value-reading component to ExpectedActualDeclarationChecker,
and is therefore postponed.
For now, Java annotations that are visible through actual type aliases
cannot have default argument values for parameters which already have
default values in the expected annotation declaration
#KT-22703 Fixed
#KT-22704 Open
Also make TypeParameterUpperBounds a "strong" incompatibility, meaning
that non-actual members from platform module are _not_ going to be
matched to the expected members if this incompatibility exists between
them, and therefore NO_ACTUAL_FOR_EXPECT will be reported on the
expected declaration, instead of ACTUAL_MISSING on the platform member.
This is needed because the difference in type parameter upper bounds can
have effect on the function signature on the platform (e.g. on JVM,
Array<T> -> T[], but Array<T> -> Comparable[] if T : Comparable<T>), and
it would be incorrect to report ACTUAL_MISSING on the member that has
nothing to do with the expected declaration that happens to coincide
with it in everything except type parameter bounds
#KT-21864 Fixed
Stanislav Erokhin