8ffee527d7
KT-3573 "Error generating primary constructor" when trying to use "this" in extensions from constructors
...
#KT-3573 Fixed
2013-09-17 17:31:47 +04:00
c017858f77
'Else' is not required in 'when' if Unit is expected
2013-09-13 22:04:46 +02:00
c8a5c9ef59
Add regression for EA-47864
2013-09-06 21:16:42 +04:00
723d5ef564
Fix default argument method calls
...
In some cases, calls of methods with default arguments were invoked via the
actual generated method, not via the "...$default" accessor
2013-09-03 22:26:05 +04:00
a49dcc0dd4
analyze when entry in independent context
2013-09-03 17:05:21 +04:00
760ec99315
Regenerate topLevelMemberInvocation testData
...
Add a source used to generate classes
2013-08-26 16:00:11 +04:00
c853c9be03
Create empty method for annotated properties w/o fields
...
There was no place in bytecode where annotations on properties without backing
fields could be stored to. Now they're written on a synthetic empty void method
with a special name ("propertyName$annotations").
(Annotations on properties cannot simply be written on getters in bytecode,
since a getter can have annotations of its own.)
2013-08-23 17:39:21 +04:00
55eb994502
KT-3919 Automatic labeling of lambdas by receiving functions
...
#KT-3919 Fixed
2013-08-22 14:27:01 +04:00
aa99c29d8d
JVM backend test for local returns
2013-08-21 20:12:05 +04:00
185b5013fe
Properly process nested try and loop blocks
...
KT-3894: Loops and finally: finally block executed twice when break and return exists in try/finally block
KT-3874: Compilation error on try catch block contains break and continue
KT-3869: Loops and finally: outer finally block not run
#KT-3869 Fixed
#KT-3894 Fixed
#KT-3874 Fixed
2013-08-19 16:06:56 +04:00
d0f042ba93
Properly generate exception table for try/catch block
...
KT-3549 'Finally' block not run when re-throwing exception
KT-3867 When catched exception occurs in finnaly block it invokes additional catch and itself
#KT-3549 Fixed
#KT-3867 Fixed
2013-08-19 16:06:56 +04:00
c9215ed8a5
KT-2784 VerifyError when passing a value to a class object's super type constructor
...
#KT-2784 Fixed
2013-08-12 18:58:09 +04:00
8a4b01d9c6
KT-3702: Inner class constructor cannot be invoked in override function with receiver
...
KT-3532: NoSuchMethodError when constructing Java inner class
KT-3847: Class is not recognized as inner when loaded from binaries
#KT-3702 Fixed
#KT-3532 Fixed
#KT-3847 Fixed
2013-08-06 10:58:27 +04:00
acf8c88cfc
Java property as annotation parameter
2013-08-02 18:59:29 +04:00
064f114b25
Allow top-level properties or properties from class object as annotation parameters
2013-08-02 18:59:26 +04:00
27801d5351
Add test: primitive values as annotation parameter
2013-08-02 18:59:25 +04:00
7f62b9259c
KT-3820 VerifyError when invoking intrinsic for range obtained from collection
...
#KT-3820 fixed
2013-07-31 15:54:45 -07:00
b3f0a23c1d
Fix android test: cannot change package name
2013-07-29 11:36:47 +04:00
09b163069f
Check Retention annotation writing annotations in bytecode
2013-07-25 17:00:04 +04:00
c11bd7104c
Write default values for annotation parameters
...
#KT-3197 Fixed
2013-07-25 16:44:03 +04:00
bb364cd393
KT-3771 Fixed
2013-07-22 18:49:56 +04:00
5c8f87658a
Made SAM adapters final.
2013-07-12 21:09:22 +04:00
728e08cc49
Rewrite AnnotationCodegen to generate annotation arguments by AnnotationDescriptor
2013-07-05 19:19:00 +04:00
cf5c5dba3d
KT-3189 Function invoke is called with no reason
...
prioritize tasks specially for invoke
#KT-3189 Fixed
#KT-3190 Fixed
#KT-3297 Fixed
2013-07-05 18:03:51 +04:00
e017645c97
Reorganized SAM-related test data.
2013-07-02 14:06:09 +04:00
3e70661a6d
Handling null correctly when wrapping function in SAM wrapper
2013-06-27 20:37:27 +04:00
d0c74755e8
Added test which should be enabled after fixing bug in front-end.
2013-06-27 17:09:18 +04:00
939b658704
Supported SAM adapter in infix calls.
2013-06-27 17:09:17 +04:00
79185b6775
Added tests with SAM adapters in comparison operators.
2013-06-27 17:09:17 +04:00
9905e2a719
Added tests with SAM adapters in "invoke" convention.
2013-06-27 17:09:16 +04:00
f35390134f
Supported SAM adapters in "in/!in" operators.
2013-06-27 17:09:16 +04:00
0059db486f
Supported SAM adapters in augmented assignment operators.
2013-06-27 17:09:16 +04:00
036960f117
Supported SAM adapters as plus/minus/etc operators.
2013-06-27 17:09:16 +04:00
b1fb0aafea
Supported SAM adapters as get/set operators.
2013-06-27 17:09:16 +04:00
8cd1880805
KT-3722: Write correct generic type information for generated fields
...
#KT-3722 Fixed
2013-06-27 15:59:48 +04:00
f2458f62c2
Prioritized super constructor calls.
2013-06-26 21:04:11 +04:00
b4ce39aeb1
Test with calling abstract wrapper which is implemented in Kotlin.
2013-06-25 20:17:46 +04:00
fd7b29ad48
Added tests with SAM adapter overridden in Kotlin class.
2013-06-25 20:17:45 +04:00
f4c3a89408
Added tests with SAM adapter inherited in Kotlin class.
2013-06-25 20:17:44 +04:00
5c3577dfed
Added tests with SAM adapter overridden in Java class.
2013-06-25 20:17:44 +04:00
d78f36a780
Minor. Renamed test.
2013-06-25 20:17:42 +04:00
ee9fcff9ca
Supported non-literal arguments for SAM adapters.
2013-06-25 20:17:42 +04:00
be02943675
Considering SAM interface FQ name in hash.
2013-06-25 20:17:41 +04:00
7ef4c8cfa8
Generating SAM wrapper class per source file.
2013-06-25 20:17:41 +04:00
fe77c3edb9
Replaced signed decimal with hex. Eliminated querying canonical path.
2013-06-25 20:16:21 +04:00
4980dacd33
Supported calls of SAM adapters for constructors.
2013-06-25 20:16:20 +04:00
356c32893b
Don't use 'iinc' instruction on byte/short/char variables
...
Android run-time verifier complains when there's any possibility that a
byte/short/char local variable could contain a value not fitting into the
type's limits.
2013-06-25 18:48:28 +04:00
68b0ad53c4
Regression test for KT-24
...
#KT-24 Obsolete
2013-06-25 18:48:20 +04:00
53cc582040
Minor, use incrementType in for-progression codegen
...
This doesn't fix anything, just makes it easier to figure out values of what
types are used where. Progression increment is of its own type, which may be
different from asmElementType in case of Byte, Char, Short progressions
2013-06-20 22:23:02 +04:00
8a14b62a23
KT-3574 Assertion error when using ?: in for range
...
#KT-3574 Fixed
Do not assert that resolvedCall is non-null, since getRangeAsBinaryCall can
return a BinaryCall that doesn't represent a range at all (as specified by the
comment in getRangeAsBinaryCall)
2013-06-20 16:03:00 +04:00
Mikhael Bogdanov