In some tests PSI and LT differ. Test data was fixed accordingly.
In the following tests I consider that difference is acceptable:
- compiler/tests-spec/testData/diagnostics/linked/expressions/try-expression/p-1/neg/3.1.kt
- compiler/tests-spec/testData/diagnostics/linked/expressions/try-expression/p-1/neg/4.1.kt
This is because:
- It only happens when recovering from syntax errors happened above in
code. I was unable to reproduce it in valid code.
- It doesn't break parsing further, the rest of the errors in file are
reported identically.
The rest of the tests will be fixed in subsequent commits.
^KT-62704 Fixed
Let ConeCompositeConflictResolver pass the results of the previous
resolver to the next one.
Otherwise, we get false positive conflicts when a set of candidates
can't be fully reduced by one resolver but could be resolved by the
subsequent application of multiple ones.
This change makes ConeCompositeConflictResolver order-dependent and
thus, ConeOverloadConflictResolver must be invoked last, because it
must work on a pre-filtered list.
Also, let ConeEquivalentCallConflictResolver use
FirStandardOverrideChecker instead of compareCallsByUsedArguments
because it's stricter.
This all fixes a false positive overload resolution ambiguity in common
metadata compilation that is caused by stdlib using the new KMP
format.
Now stdlib metadata is in the classpath, and so declarations from the
stdlib are returned from both MetadataSymbolProvider and
KlibBasedSymbolProvider.
This isn't a problem per se because duplicate candidates are filtered
out by ConeEquivalentCallConflictResolver (K1 works analogously), but
in the case of top-level functions with generic receivers like
Collection<T>.toTypedArray, the check failed because of the direct
comparison of receiver types.
#KT-60943 Fixed
Previously, when a candidate was found with an applicability that is
better than the current best applicability, all previous candidates were
thrown away. Now we keep them, unless the new applicability is
successful. If no successful candidates are found, we fully resolve all
the unsuccessful ones and select the ones with the least bad
applicability. This improves diagnostics for unresolved calls.
#KT-57844 Fixed
The expression needs to be resolved first to determine if there is a
receiver that needs to be extracted to a temporary variable. Also, the
special case for prefix increment/decrement on local variable without
delegates requires resolution to check if the variable is local.
^KT-56771 Fixed
^KT-56659 Fixed
Some of the changed tests may duplicate other existing diagnostics,
but that should not be reason not to report them at all.
There might be another job to be done to avoid diagnostic duplications
Test framework assumes that there won't be any files with same names
in one test. But there were cases when test declared test file
with same name as one of files with helpers (e.g. `functions.kt`)
* Change 1.6 to 1.7 constants
* Fix SAFE_CALL_WILL_CHANGE_NULLABILITY for testData
* Change EXPOSED_PROPERTY_TYPE_IN_CONSTRUCTOR_WARNING to EXPOSED_PROPERTY_TYPE_IN_CONSTRUCTOR_ERROR
* Change NON_EXHAUSTIVE_WHEN_STATEMENT to NO_ELSE_IN_WHEN
* Fix testData for SafeCallsAreAlwaysNullable
* Change T -> T & Any in test dumps
* Change INVALID_CHARACTERS_NATIVE_WARNING -> INVALID_CHARACTERS_NATIVE_ERROR
* TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM_WARNING -> TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM_ERROR
Changes from FE1.0:
1. As discussed previously, no expression evaluation happens during this
check.
2. FE1.0 doesn't check redundant object comparisons.
FIR simply ignores anything after the first comma if the when expression
doesn't have a subject. Hence, the checker has to rely on PSI structure
instead.
FE1.0 only reports SENSELESS_COMPARISON if one of the operand is `null`.
This change makes FIR reports also in case one of the operand has type
`Nothing?`.
In addition, fix handling of type alias in ConeTypeContext#isNullableType
Roman Efremov