azalea/kotlin-fork
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
109,329 Commits 1 Branch 0 Tags
dd94de3a344e309815509bdaf5f43e2d384ef143
Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Evgeniy.Zhelenskiy 7eab4b672d [K1, K2, CLI] Mark whole position range of compiler diagnostics in CLI 
#KT-64989
 2024-02-08 12:59:31 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh db03cd8cd7 LV 2.0: update diagnostic message in MPP integration test 2023-09-19 15:46:30 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh cc2be502f6 LV 2.0: mute two MPP integration tests 2023-09-19 15:46:28 +00:00
Nikita Bobko 2127b2ce68 expect/actual classes: experimental -> Beta 
KT-61573
^KT-61712 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/12044/files

It's a follow up commit

According our guidelines, it must be in Beta
https://kotlinlang.org/docs/components-stability.html#stability-of-subcomponents

And the whole multiplatform was in Beta, so we can't make part of the
multiplatform to have lower stability level
 2023-09-11 13:57:28 +00:00
Nikita Bobko 01fc708a0f Mark expect/actual classifiers as experimental 
^KT-61573 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/11969/timeline

Tests:
- MultiPlatformIntegrationTestGenerated
- CliTestGenerated
- MultiPlatformIntegrationTestGenerated
- DiagnosticTestGenerated.Multiplatform
- FirLightTreeOldFrontendDiagnosticsTestGenerated

Also add -Xexpect-actual-classes flag to all necessary ./libraries/* modules
Otherwise compilation of those modules failes because of `-Werror`
 2023-09-04 12:21:37 +00:00
Nikita Bobko 25c082f02b K1: Implement a checker that disallows to have different member scopes for expect open and its actual 
^KT-22841 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/11603/timeline

The commit also introduces `@AllowDifferentMembersInActual` annotation in
stdlib which allows to suppress the diagnostic
 2023-08-21 19:51:08 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh 85d6a4d1af Migration to expect/actual: fix multiplatform integration tests 2017-09-15 18:28:50 +03:00
Stanislav Erokhin 59efedf610 Rename platform to header. 2016-12-13 18:00:00 +03:00
Alexander Udalov 8d3f6f1ce7 Check platform<->impl declaration compatibility 
For each platform declaration, there must be at least one impl declaration in
the module with the compatible signature; similarly, for each impl declaration,
there must be at least one platform declaration with the compatible signature.

Note that currently the presence of the 'impl' modifier is not checked yet.

Also, the sad fact is that if you have platform and impl declarations which are
not compatible, you get two errors: on the platform delcaration and on the impl
declaration. This needs to be addressed as well
 2016-11-25 20:50:26 +03:00