The parameter, unlike other ones, should span the whole method, since
throughout the whole method it has some value and thus should be
visible.
This effectively rolls bb5a99ec back
#KT-64309 Fixed
The patch adopts and reuses the optimizations from the legacy backend.
The optimizations remove useless temporary variables,
statements and simplify generated JS code.
The optimizations can be disabled by `-Xoptimize-generated-js=false`.
Related to KT-51139
Previously, it was obtained from expected type of a variable being assigned,
but it's better to use the type of resulting expression
Initially this part was brought in 4ab0897d7d,
but as we see in commit message and tests it was all about unit-coercion
We are going to deprecate `WITH_RUNTIME` directive. The main reason
behind this change is that `WITH_STDLIB` directive better describes
its meaning, specifically it will add kotlin stdlib to test's classpath.
- Mangle names for extension receivers in lambdas
- Correctly mark anonymous variables and variables for arguments
for destructuring declaration.
There is one failure remaining which is cause by lambda
type inference differences that leads to FIR having an explicit
return from the lambda whereas old frontend leads to an implicit
return. This difference is visible in debug stepping that the
local variables tests do because the implicit return has the line
number of the closing brace of the lambda. This change adds an
IrText test to make the difference clear.
Putting them in the local variable table means that the debugger
needs to have special handling for parameters with specific names.
That forces us to generate mangled names for these.
Instead of also implementing the name mangling for FIR, this
change gets rid of the parameters from the LVT instead.
Their call sites are all in the same file, so we can check whether the
declarations used in the inline function are accessible from all the
places where it will be inlined.
#KT-48736 Fixed
CoroutineTransformermethodVisitor attempts to extend the ranges
of local variables in various situations. Probably in an attempt
to give a better debugging experience. However, all of these
range extensions lead to invalid local variable tables where
something is in the local variable table where nothing is in the
corresponding slot.
The code that extends variables to the next suspension point
instead of ending them when they are no longer live has issues
with loops. When resuming and reentering the loop, the locals
table will mention a local that we did not spill and which
is therefore not restored when resuming.
The code that extends local variable table entries if there
are no suspension points between two entries doesn't work
for code such as:
```
var s: String
if (suspendHere() == "OK") {
s = "OK"
} else {
s = "FAIL"
}
```
If the local variable ranges are collapsed into one, one of
the branches will have the local defined in the local variable
table before the slot is initialized.
The coroutine transformation would leave locals in the local
variable table across the code that reloads local variables from
the continuation on reentry. However, when reentering the function
the local has no value until after the reloads from the
continuation.
This change splits the locals in the local variable table to
avoid such uninitialized locals. A local alive across a
suspension point has its range split in two. One that goes
from the original start to the state label for the restart
after the suspension. The other goes from after the local
has been reloaded from the continuation until the previous
end of the local.
This solves no immediate deficiency, but is a to-do that arose as part
of an ongoing effort to port the old, slightly too restrictive
checkLocalVariableTable tests to the more "functional" debugger
infrastructure.
This just shaves a little bit of overhead off the test expectations
and couples them less tightly to the specifics of the test
infrastructure.
Reveals discrepancy in LVT presence on lambda implementations on the
old and new backend.
The generated code in the constructors of Suspend Lambda objects is
identical, but the IR backend generates an LVT with the constructor
parameters.
The user has to be very insistent to see this ("for step into" +
disabling "Show only kotlin variables"), but it is an observable
difference.
The existing backend restores LVs and parameters from the suspend lambda
fields used for spilling between suspension points, hence they are
visible in the debugger as local variables, plain and simple.
This PR introduces the same pattern to the IR backend, to bring the
debugging experience in line with the existing backend.
Both backends are still at the mercy of the liveness analysis
performed in the coroutine transformer where a liveness analysis
minimizes live ranges of entries in the LVT. E.g. an unused parameter
will be dropped entirely.
Adjusted existing test expectations accounting for the differences in
LV behavior.
The debug experiece of destructuring patterns in lambdas is different
across the two backends due to the IR backend moving local variables
to fields.
However, since the destructuring variable is never actually visible in
the debugger (no linenumbers in the live range of the variable), and
the variable is never used for anything other than hiding it from the
debugger, we propose that it is not actually necessary to include it
in the LVT (and in fact, could be left out of the LVT on the old
backend).
This commit unifies the expectation format between the stepping and
LVT tests in the new debugging test harness.
Furthermore, it introduces a compression of runs of locations without
linenumbers. These default to showing as bytecode offsets from
previous line number, which overspecifies the tests: the bytecodes
chosen should not be constrained by a debugging step test.
This commit enables the execution of suspend box tests in a separate
test. It's a QoL improvement in the existing bb tests but, motivating
these changes, enables the new debugger stepping tests to step
coroutine code.
Nikita Nazarov