Previously when unsigned arrays were passed as vararg in a named form the necessary spread element wasn't generated, which resulted in a compilation error.
^KT-63514 fixed
This commit solves a stub type inconsistency problem.
As a part of KT-59369 fix we decided (see commit 299d2799),
that ConeStubTypeForChainInference has a scope of Any,
so we can safely resolve only to equals/hashCode/toString.
However, later we can replace a stub type with some inferred type,
which can have its own equals/hashCode/toString implementation,
while the call still refers Any member.
In this situation FIR2IR decides that we are calling a fake override,
which is not true, in fact we are calling an overriding method.
This leads to a crash in Native backend.
To solve this situation, we provide an explicit cast of a dispatch
receiver with a stub type (ConeStubTypeForChainInference) to Any,
thus confirming directly we are calling Any method and nothing else.
#KT-63932 Fixed
Context:
- Kotlin allows functions overloaded with different array element types.
- Varargs are lowered to Array parameters.
- Before this commit, K/Wasm erased an array element type
from the signature, similar to type argument erasure in other cases.
Fix:
Stop erasing type arguments in arrays when computing v-table signatures.
^KT-58852 Fixed
They were accidentally fixed with `[FIR] Process all overridden members from intersection scopes`
commit, which itself introduced incorrect behavior, which was properly
fixed with ... commit. So KT-64081 started to appear again
Previously, there was a contract that each callable symbol in the chain
of `processDirectOverriddenWithBaseScope` will be unique. And if some
symbol is accessible from multiple scopes, then only last of them will
be returned as a component of `MemberWithScope`
But after the change from previous commit, we don't have this contract anymore.
Which means that we may meet the same symbol during processing hierarchy
of overridden functions (but with different base scopes)
So if some code utilizes `process...Overridden...WithBaseScope` functions
it should consider that the same symbol may be obtained several times
^KT-63738 Fixed
In case of HMPP structure with common JVM module (e.g. shared between
JVM and Android) one can reference the same field from java code,
so it should be shared between fir2ir sessions
^KT-63574 Fixed
Nikita Nazarov