E.g. in `x + f()` where `f` is an inline lambda, the instructions for
`+` should have the line number of that expression (while previously
they instead had the line number of the last line of the lambda).
^KT-51738 Fixed
If we do not do this, the state-machine builder will not know the type
of the ACONST_NULL, defaulting to Object, leading to VerifyError.
Alternatively, we could use LVT to deduce the type, but getting types
from LVT is something I got rid of long time ago, and I have no desire
to return it back.
Generating CHECKCAST hints the state-machine builder the type of the
variable avoiding the issue of VerifyError. However, this CHECKCAST
replaces StrictBasicValue.NULL_VALUE with BasicValue in
OptimizationBasicInterpreter. To preserve optimization on not-spilling
known nulls, introduce BasicValues, which represent typed nulls and
create BasicInterpreter, which is aware of them. This way we have the
best of two worlds - we do not spill known nulls, and we know the type
of ACONST_NULL.
#KT-51718 Fixed
* Change 1.6 to 1.7 constants
* Fix SAFE_CALL_WILL_CHANGE_NULLABILITY for testData
* Change EXPOSED_PROPERTY_TYPE_IN_CONSTRUCTOR_WARNING to EXPOSED_PROPERTY_TYPE_IN_CONSTRUCTOR_ERROR
* Change NON_EXHAUSTIVE_WHEN_STATEMENT to NO_ELSE_IN_WHEN
* Fix testData for SafeCallsAreAlwaysNullable
* Change T -> T & Any in test dumps
* Change INVALID_CHARACTERS_NATIVE_WARNING -> INVALID_CHARACTERS_NATIVE_ERROR
* TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM_WARNING -> TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM_ERROR
Do not generate linenumber for the start of the finally block, because
that is usually where the only word 'finally' is located. Instead,
generate linenumber for the first expression inside the finally block.
Not generating this linenumber fixes an issue in code coverage tools
which would consider such finally uncovered. Although this might be
technically considered as designed, it makes more sense to NOT detect it
as uncovered because semantics of the finally block shouldn't really
differ whether it's executed normally or because an exception happened.
It's also beneficial for the tool support to behave like javac, which
doesn't generate the linenumber either.
#KT-50973 Fixed
This is a partial revert of e857966edb.
Specifically, behavior is restored in the old backend, which will allow
to support language version 1.3, where this language feature was not
enabled yet. There are no changes in the JVM IR backend, because to
enable JVM IR with LV 1.3, you need to pass the compiler argument
`-Xuse-ir` which is not stable and we don't guarantee anything about it.
#KT-50251
We are going to deprecate `WITH_RUNTIME` directive. The main reason
behind this change is that `WITH_STDLIB` directive better describes
its meaning, specifically it will add kotlin stdlib to test's classpath.
In general, we would rather prefer a range-based for loop to look like
a counter loop in Java ('for (i = start; i < end; ++i) { <BODY> }').
This corresponds to
i = start;
do {
if (i >= end) break;
<BODY>
} while ( { ++i; true } )
However, HotSpot doesn't recognize Kotlin unsigned integer comparison
in 'if (i >= end) break;' as a counter loop condition. Thus, the loop
doesn't get optimized as a counter loop, resulting in a performance
regression.
If we use exclusive range-based for loop instead, then we actually use
unsigned integer equality instead of unsigned integer comparison, which
is Ok for HotSpot.
KT-49444
The JVM and newer Android runtimes treats that the same as if
there is no enclosing method. However, older Android runtimes
for Android 5 and 6 throw exceptions on reflective access
and even older runtimes have different behavior. To avoid
those issues, exclude <clinit> from enclosing method attributes.
^ KT-48754 Fixed
val y = 1
object { val x = y }
->
class XKt$1(`$y`: Int) { val x: Int = `$y` }
Note that `$y` is not stored in a field because it's not used outside
the primary constructor.
One exception is captured inline parameters on the JVM backend, as the
bytecode inliner uses field assignment instructions (setfield) to locate
them; removing the field is thus not possible.
pyos