This change allows to revert adding `WITH_STDLIB` directive
to tests which happened at `a9343aeb`.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Udalov <Alexander.Udalov@jetbrains.com>
This inconsistency is present due to not using the `// WITH_STDLIB`
in the above tests. When K1 creates the enum, it tries to generate
`entries()`, and for that it tries to load `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries`,
but this is actually an unresolved reference. K1 silently swallows it,
and proceeds.
The reason K2 doesn't fail is that in order to generate `entries()` it
simply creates the necessary `ConeClassLikeType` with the desired
`classId` instead of loading the whole `ClassDescriptor`.
The reason we can still observe `$ENTRIES` and `$entries` in K1
is because they are generated during the JVM codegen, and it
only checks if the `EnumEntries` language feature is supported. It
doesn't check if the `entries` property has really existed in IR
(by this time it's expected to have already been lowered to the
`get-entries` function - that's why "has ... existed").
The reason why the codegen doesn't fail when working with
`kotlin.enums.EnumEntries` is because it creates its
own `IrClassSymbol`.
^KT-55840 Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-8727
Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
The reference can be lowered to `this` if it is captured in the lexical
scope of the corresponding enum entry, and not used by the enum entry's
super constructor. Otherwise, it is lowered to
`GETFIELD SomeEnum.SomeEntry`.
Most of these tests used this directive as a way to opt in to a new
language feature, and most of those features are already stable for a
long time, so no opt-in is needed. Some other tests used the directive
to opt out from a language feature, replace those by the `LANGUAGE`
directive. One test used the directive to test behavior that actually
depended on the API version; use `API_VERSION` directive there instead.
In an inner class of the enum entry class, enum entry reference should
be generated as an outer 'this', not as a enum entry access, because
enum entry itself may be not initialized yet.
vladislav.grechko