Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikolay Lunyak bcfafc601e Add EnumEntries to minimal-stdlib-for-tests
This change allows to revert adding `WITH_STDLIB` directive
to tests which happened at `a9343aeb`.

Co-authored-by: Alexander Udalov <Alexander.Udalov@jetbrains.com>
2023-03-02 10:23:38 +00:00
Nikolay Lunyak a9343aeb7d [FIR] KT-55840: Ensure everything actually works
This inconsistency is present due to not using the `// WITH_STDLIB`
in the above tests. When K1 creates the enum, it tries to generate
`entries()`, and for that it tries to load `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries`,
but this is actually an unresolved reference. K1 silently swallows it,
and proceeds.

The reason K2 doesn't fail is that in order to generate `entries()` it
simply creates the necessary `ConeClassLikeType` with the desired
`classId` instead of loading the whole `ClassDescriptor`.

The reason we can still observe `$ENTRIES` and `$entries` in K1
is because they are generated during the JVM codegen, and it
only checks if the `EnumEntries` language feature is supported. It
doesn't check if the `entries` property has really existed in IR
(by this time it's expected to have already been lowered to the
`get-entries` function - that's why "has ... existed").

The reason why the codegen doesn't fail when working with
`kotlin.enums.EnumEntries` is because it creates its
own `IrClassSymbol`.

^KT-55840 Fixed

Merge-request: KT-MR-8727
Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
2023-02-10 16:57:51 +00:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov 88efa6bfb6 Update tests after switching to LV 1.9 2023-01-30 09:29:57 +00:00
Ivan Kochurkin 8883de3f00 [FIR] Don't resolve Enum.declaringClass and Enum.getDeclaringClass
^KT-53946 Fixed
2022-11-23 18:29:29 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh 983fa4c8c7 FIR: add temporary access to Enum.getDeclaringClass (see KT-49653) 2022-01-27 17:27:39 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh cf104c8433 FIR: add status line to all failing black box tests 2021-11-20 03:37:31 +03:00
Mikhael Bogdanov 1c612376dd Disable some android box test 2021-01-28 18:30:48 +01:00
Mikhail Zarechenskiy eacc94a89d Do not hide synthetic properties except isEmpty from Java
In order to hide synthetic property isEmpty from JDK 15, there was
 added additional logic in 5cc12b49fc but
 it also lead to the fact that now it's impossible to call synthetic
 property `declaringClass` on `Enum` as it's in the same list as method
 isEmpty(). Note that it's questionable behavior, probably we should
 also hide `declaringClass` as well but for now we turn it back to
 preserve compatibility

 #KT-42467 Fixed
2020-10-15 12:26:17 +03:00