In AbstractPositionManagerTest, built-ins could no longer be resolved because
JvmIDEVirtualFileFinder is used in IDE tests (even when the compilation is
called through JvmResolveUtil/GenerationUtils as in compiler tests), which is
not yet able to locate .kotlin_builtins files
Introduce a new method KotlinClassFinder#findBuiltInsData, which is only
implemented correctly in the JvmCliVirtualFileFinder because it's only used in
the compiler code at the moment.
Introduce JvmBuiltInsPackageFragmentProvider, the purpose of which is to look
for .kotlin_builtins files in the classpath and provide definitions of
built-ins from those files.
Also exclude script.runtime from compilation because, as other excluded
modules, it has no dependency on the stdlib and is no longer compilable from
the IDE now, because it cannot resolve built-ins from anywhere
- In tests on built-ins with no sources, just call
JvmResolve.analyze(environment) and inspect the resulting module
- In AbstractLocalClassProtoTest, create container via
TDAForJVM.createContainer
- Inline single module container creation into AbstractDiagnosticsTest
Use the same approach that is used for creating function type classes
(Function{0,1,...}) + add Cloneable to supertypes of Array and primitive arrays
#KT-5537 Fixed
This is needed because SourceNavigationHelper uses default platform and it
needs default imports to be able to resolve references (otherwise
NavigateToLibrarySourceTestGenerated breaks)
Since its scope is now empty, no descriptor now has a container that is an
instance of IncrementalPackageFragment -> a lot of code is not needed anymore
Unless the compatibility option "-Xsingle-module" is passed, the compiler will
create two modules instead of one now (see TopDownAnalyzerFacadeForJVM): the
main module contains Kotlin and Java sources and binaries from the previous
compilation of the given module chunk, the dependency module contains all other
Kotlin and Java binaries. This fixes some issues where the compiler couldn't
detect that the used symbol was from another module, and did not forbid some
usages which are only possible inside the module (see KT-10001).
The ideal way to deal with modules here would be to exactly recreate the
project structure, for example as it's done in JvmAnalyzerFacade and usages.
This is postponed until later
#KT-10001 Fixed
#KT-11840 In Progress
Currently behavior is unchanged because the "all project" scope is passed,
however in the future this will allow to implement separate modules in the
compiler properly
Filtering out obsolete package parts in incremental compilation was necessary
before the big refactoring of package parts, when package parts had been
compiled together into a package class
The only place where the logic has changed is in AbstractDiagnosticsTest, where
modules are already created and sealed before the analysis. Copy-paste the
container creation logic there (it's almost fine because it's also present in a
bunch of other tests), and simplify it: get rid of incremental compilation and
other stuff irrelevant for diagnostic tests.
This is needed to make analyzeFilesWithJavaIntegration configure the module
properly before sealing it
Yan Zhulanow