This commit adds code to check whether a deserialized cone type is a
special function type kind or not when resolving the type of a lambda
expression (anonymous function). If it is a special function kind, it
sets the type of lambda based on the special function kind.
^KT-64994 Fixed
The test infrastructure for analysis supports binary module tests, but
the binary build does not use another binary module as a dependency when
it passes the class path. As a result, each binary module build does not
work when they have dependency on each other.
This commit fixes the issue by
1. Topological sort in the order of dependency graph for test modules.
2. Pass module paths as extra class paths when they have dependency on
each other.
^KT-64994
Generally the wrapping anonymous initializer can be used as a
"containing declaration" for some elements, but since the initialiser
for the last script expression could be dropped (the expression could
be converted to the result property), this may lead to the surprises,
e.g. as described in KT-65984
This fix marks the last initialiser as local, preventing it from being
referenced as "containing declaration".
#KT-65984
namely, add them to importing scopes directly and according to the
schema used for other implicit imports, rather than adding them
to the regular script file imports. See KT-65982 for explanation.
#KT-65982 fixed
The base class in scripting considered obsolete and therefore supported
via some ad-hoc mechanisms. In particular parameters to the base class
c-tor are passed via script provided properties. But in combination
with the resolution logic, this leads to issues described in KT-60452
This commits filters out such parameters from script resolution
scope and avoids this problem for now.
Bot it should be noted that proper diagnostics for properties shadowing
should still be implemented - see #KT-65809
#KT-60452 fixed
Here is the reasoning behind that change:
Historically, all the declarations generated by compiler plugins
were marked with `SYNTHESIZED` member kind in Kotlin Metadata
by K1 compiler.
In K1 IDE, descriptors were deserialized directly from the Kotlin
Metadata, and they saw all the generated declarations from it.
In the stubs, however, such declarations were not materialized at all.
It caused no troubles, since K1 IDE relied on descriptors to get the
essential resolution information in completion and other subsystems.
So, the resolution of members from jars processed
by compiler plugins (e.g. `kotlinx-serialization-json`) was mostly fine.
In K2 IDE, however, we use stubs to "deserialize" FIR declarations from
them, to later create `KtSymbol`s upon that FIR.
If we see a library file which was processed by compiler plugins, we
build stubs for it based on the Kotlin Metadata, and then use stubs to
create FIR.
But if stubs do not contain information about the generated
declarations,
then the resulting FIR will also not contain such declarations.
In the end, the K2 IDE would also be blind to such declarations, since
there is no other way to retrieve them from the library jar.
By meterializing all the synthethic declarations in stubs (with some
minor exceptions for data classes), we would avoid such problems,
and the resolve of such declarations from compiler jars in
K2 IDE would become possible.
Important note: currently, the Kotlin Metadata format between K1 and K2
frontends is not 100% the same; most notably, in K2, the generated
declarations are marked as regular declarations,
not as `SYNTHESIZED` ones.
Hence, if you compile a jar with the current version of K2 frontend,
then all the generated declarations would have a regular `DECLARATION`
origin, and there would be no such issues as described above.
There are two notes here:
1. K2 IDE still has to support the jars compiled by the K1 compiler,
so it still makes sense to alter the stubs and make the generated
declarations visible.
2. The issue about the different stub formats has been reported
(see KT-64924), and might be resolved in the future.
So it is possible that K2 frontend's metadata will also start
marking the generated declarations as `SYNTHESIZED`.
^KT-64808 Fixed
Before this commit, the expect-actual resolver could find expects in
regular dependencies
Note: The appeared `VIRTUAL_MEMBER_HIDDEN` in
compiler/fir/analysis-tests/testData/resolveWithStdlib/multiModule/FakeOverrides.kt
isn't caused by my change. It's caused by fixing the testData dependency
syntax notation.
The testData improperly used regular dependency syntax notation, while
it should have been using dependsOn
Before:
Regular dependency syntax notation
// MODULE: androidMain(commonMain)
After:
dependsOn dependency syntax notation
// MODULE: androidMain()()(commonMain)
The previous one was incorrect for K1 since parent of top-level function
is `IrClass`, not `IrPackageFragment`.
The change is non-functional, K1 still worked correctly, but had to do
some extra work when inlining `emptyArray` calls and produces less
performant bytecode.
Allow multiple bases with default
implementations as long as there's a
non-abstract symbol from a class.
Our rules for Kotlin are stricter than
those in Java.
Check all members for `Visibility.Unknown`,
otherwise we miss them when they come
from supertypes. This is the reason why
the FP intellij build failed with a
cryptic stacktrace instead of a
human-readable diagnostic.
Also, do report the diagnostic at all
cases of `Visibilities.Unknown`. Turns
out, there are no "simple to reason
about" situations here :(
Also, an interesting detail:
`retrieveDirectOverriddenOf` returns an
empty list for intersection overrides.
But this doesn't seem to break anything...
Replacing `CANNOT_INFER_VISIBILITY`'s
type `KtDeclaration` with
`PsiNameIdentifierOwner` and the related
changes in `PositioningStrategies`
were needed to prevent an exception saying that
`PsiClassImpl` is not a subtype of
`KtDeclaration`.
This code does lead to inferring
`Visibilities.Unknown`, but it's not
reported anywhere. This is because it
happens inside `AbstractIntSet` which
comes to us "pre-compiled" by javac,
whereas `FirOverrideChecker` only checks
members within `KotlinClass`.
^KT-65972
The rule of thumb is the following:
If the `if` and `when` can be successfully replaced with `while`,
then it is used as a statement, otherwise, it is used as an expression.
#KT-59883
All existing tests use custom test data for FIR because the diagnostic
text in FIR has to have a dot at the end. Also, the K2 checker doesn't
check usages in imports because there are no "import checkers" in K2
right now, this will need to be fixed later if necessary.
#KT-60797 Fixed
In some cases we transform flexible type into non-flexible during
enhancement, but don't add `@EnhancedNullability` attribute to them,
which breaks consistency with K1 on IR level
This commit fixes it
^KT-65302
A class can inherit two declarations that are compatible from the
overridability standpoint and are therefore combined to a non-trivial
intersection.
At the same time, the class can declare a member declaration that
only overrides one of the intersection's members.
In this case, we break up the intersection and only add the overridden
parts to the declared member's direct overridden list.
If the class doesn't override the intersection, it exists as
intersection override, like before.
#KT-65487 Fixed
Pavel Kirpichenkov