Because generateDefaultGetterBody/generateDefaultSetterBody reference
the property's backing field, which in case of extension properties
leads to an error "Unbound symbols not allowed" because extension
property cannot have a backing field.
In some way, this check is similar to the `isExpect` check in
`generatePrimaryConstructor`.
This feature is supported only on JS backend so those tests on JVM
are meaningless. Also those tests had passed on jvm because of
old codegen tests didn't use `MODULE` directive and analyze all
files in tests in single module
When we generate call for 'foo', we make decision about invoking
a 'foo$default' too late, after the call arguments are generated.
If 'foo' was an override, and base class (interface) was generic,
'foo' in base class could have a different Kotlin and JVM
signature, so the arguments we generated could be generated wrong
(primitive or inline class values instead of boxes, see KT-38680).
Also, we always selected first base class in supertypes list,
which caused KT-15971.
Look into resolved call and see if we should actually call
'foo$default' instead of 'foo' when determining actual callable.
Overrides can't introduce default parameter values, and
override-equivalent inherited methods with default parameters
is an error in a child class. Thus, if we are calling a class
member function with a default parameters, there should be one
and only one overridden function that has default parameter values
and overrides nothing.
- To fix this test `ExpectActualTable` has to be refactored from usage
of descriptors to IdSignature since Wrapped and Deserialized descriptors
for the same declaration are not equal to each other.
Also:
* Do not rename public ABI fields
This includes backing fields for const, lateinit, @JvmField properties,
and instance fields for objects.
* FAKE_OVERRIDE declarations for static members of parent Java classes
Required to report cases when a Kotlin function accidentally overrides
Java class member.
Without the `-Xmultifile-parts-inherit` mode for now.
This is implemented as follows: FileClassLowering collects information
about multifile parts and the corresponding facades, which a later
GenerateMultifileFacades phase uses to generate new IrFile instances and
add it to the module fragment that's being compiled.
Note that GenerateMultifileFacades is in the end of lowering phases
because delegates in the facade should be generated for all additional
functions generated by certain lowerings (default arguments,
JvmOverloads, etc.). If GenerateMultifileFacades was right after
FileClassLowering, they would still be generated, but we'd then process
them in lowerings mentioned above, which would result in duplicated
logic in the bytecode. There's a new bytecode text test which checks
that this doesn't happen for functions with default arguments.
Quoted from https://kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/classes.html
"On the JVM, if all of the parameters of the primary constructor have
default values, the compiler will generate an additional parameterless
constructor which will use the default values. This makes it easier to
use Kotlin with libraries such as Jackson or JPA that create class
instances through parameterless constructors."
Two known issues with generateNonPartClassDeclarations that was here
before were the fact that we didn't sort sealed classes and its
subclasses which led to NoSuchMethodError (KT-27097), and the fact that
we didn't skip expect classes which led to incorrect duplicate JVM class
name diagnostic (KT-30843)
#KT-27097 Fixed
#KT-30843 Fixed
Proper SMAP support for default values from expect declarations is required.
Default value in expect declaration could has line number that
exceed line count in actual file that causes an error
#KT-23739 Fixed
#KT-29174 Open
* Copy lowering from konan to common
* Keep actual default parameters when both actual and expect default parameters are present
* Run lowering before inline in JS IR BE to fix
box/multiplatform/defaultArguments/inlineFunctionWithDefaultLambda.kt
It's difficult to fix KT-22818 until the IR comes along, so we're
providing a workaround where one can disable the
ACTUAL_FUNCTION_WITH_DEFAULT_ARGUMENTS error and provide default values
in the actual function, to avoid exception from the backend.
#KT-22818
Dmitriy Novozhilov