LazyAnnotations are only used for classes and files, and in the latter
case it will now contain file annotations as normal annotations, without
the target "file:"
Add PropertyDescriptor.backingField/delegateField to store annotations
on the field directly in an otherwise almost empty descriptor instance,
instead of storing them with use-sites in the corresponding property
descriptor. Instead of AnnotationWithTarget, create AnnotationDescriptor
instances in AnnotationSplitter. Change DescriptorRenderer to render
annotations on "related" declarations when needed, with the explicit
use-site target if applicable.
Most changes in diagnostic test data are related to the fact that
annotations which are known to have an incompatible use-site to the
declaration they're applied at (such as `@param:`-annotation on a
function), are now not loaded at all. It's fine because the code is
erroneous, so it doesn't really matter how do we load annotations with
invalid targets (some of this logic is also changed freely in subsequent
commits). Some changes are also explained by the fact that for example
an annotation on the property which is only applicable to FIELD is now
rendered with an explicit use-site target `@field:`, regardless of
whether it did have that use-site target syntactically or not.
Basically, after this change there's no point in calling
Annotations.getUseSiteTargetedAnnotations/getAllAnnotations anymore
because it's easier and more intuitive to just use Annotations of the
corresponding descriptor -- the backing / delegate field (introduced in
this commit) or the extension receiver / setter parameter (related
behavior was fixed in previous commits). Usages of
use-site-target-related methods will be refactored out in subsequent
commits
Before this commit, class super-type could be sealed only in the case
it's the class we are inside or in the same file with.
However, it's quite possible for the expect sealed class
to be implemented by typealias.
So in this commit we allow class super-type to be sealed
if it's typealias expansion we are inside.
These three methods are conflicting with existing extensions,
thus the behavior might be changed when switching to JDK 11
Probably, it's worth revisiting our strategy here,
e.g. by blacklisting all new methods in
#KT-24974 Fixed
Suspend functions and callable references to suspend lambdas are already
supported.
Support callSuspendBy of suspend function of big arity.
#KT-24854: Fixed
Avoid name clashes in cases such as
inline class Login(val login: String)
inline class Password(val password: String)
fun validate(login: Login) { ... }
fun validate(password: Password) { ... }
The design is to use `suspend fun` instead of coercion, just as suspend
lambdas.
However, this syntax is not supported in the parser. But this is not a
problem, since the coercion lead to internal compiler error.
As a workaround everybody uses suspend lambdas.
#KT-24860: Fixed
Alexander Udalov