ensure fir annotations are included in FirDanglingModifierList and resolved,
dedicated DanglingTopLevelModifierListStructureElement exists for top
level lists only, class level lists are processed by containing structure
element
k1 would suggest `get` as well
but with current fir structure with fake desugaring
get is moved to the separate fake psi which doesn't exist
thus the problem is ignored for now
^ KTIJ-24025
^KTIJ-23669
FirErrorFunctions are created for unknown labels
when the code in return statements is not complete yet.
Such labels cannot be resolved, and no symbols should be created for them
Make smart-casts non-transparent expression without delegation
to underlying FirQualifiedAccessExpression, as children delegation in
fir tree has unclear semantics
Remove two different kinds of tree nodes for smart-casts
`owner` is a PSI element, it can never be an instance of
`KtConstructorSymbol`
Also, make `MutableCollection` an extension receiver instead of context
receiver for the consistency
In qualified expression like `foo().`, selector expression is null.
Because of that the whole expression was marked as an error FIR
expression, and `foo()` part was not resolved at all (including
arguments and everything else).
This commit fixes the problem by providing receiver's FIR expression
as an underlying expression for error FIR expression. That way
it will be seen by all resolve transformers and will be successfully
resolved.
^KTIJ-21484 Fixed
If an import alias is involved, they could be not identical.
Since an import alias ends with a simple identifer, we can simply drop
the first segment of qualified access and try the assertion again.
The IDE expects the super type calls to resolve to the constructor
invoked and not the class. The frontend itself resolves to the
class, so an extra layer is needed to adjust that to the constructor.
Use-site substitution override happens in situations like this:
```
interface List<A> { fun get(i: Int): A }
fun take(list: List<String>) {
list.get(10) // this call
}
```
We want to have those overrides unwrapped, because we don't want
to deal with a different KtSymbol for each possible use-site
^KT-50862 Fixed
The following error code path only runs in depended mode.
Test succeeded in normal analysis mode but failed in depended analysis mode.
java.lang.Exception: Test succeeded in normal analysis mode but failed in depended analysis mode.
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.test.base.AbstractLowLevelApiTest.runTest(AbstractLowLevelApiTest.kt:126)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.components.OverriddenDeclarationProviderTestGenerated.testOnEnumEntry(OverriddenDeclarationProviderTestGenerated.java:72)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.junit.platform.commons.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:688)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.MethodInvocation.proceed(MethodInvocation.java:60)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.InvocationInterceptorChain$ValidatingInvocation.proceed(InvocationInterceptorChain.java:131)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.extension.TimeoutExtension.intercept(TimeoutExtension.java:149)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.extension.TimeoutExtension.interceptTestableMethod(TimeoutExtension.java:140)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.extension.TimeoutExtension.interceptTestMethod(TimeoutExtension.java:84)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.ExecutableInvoker$ReflectiveInterceptorCall.lambda$ofVoidMethod$0(ExecutableInvoker.java:115)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.ExecutableInvoker.lambda$invoke$0(ExecutableInvoker.java:105)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.InvocationInterceptorChain$InterceptedInvocation.proceed(InvocationInterceptorChain.java:106)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.InvocationInterceptorChain.proceed(InvocationInterceptorChain.java:64)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.InvocationInterceptorChain.chainAndInvoke(InvocationInterceptorChain.java:45)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.InvocationInterceptorChain.invoke(InvocationInterceptorChain.java:37)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.ExecutableInvoker.invoke(ExecutableInvoker.java:104)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.ExecutableInvoker.invoke(ExecutableInvoker.java:98)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.TestMethodTestDescriptor.lambda$invokeTestMethod$6(TestMethodTestDescriptor.java:210)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.ThrowableCollector.execute(ThrowableCollector.java:73)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.TestMethodTestDescriptor.invokeTestMethod(TestMethodTestDescriptor.java:206)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.TestMethodTestDescriptor.execute(TestMethodTestDescriptor.java:131)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.TestMethodTestDescriptor.execute(TestMethodTestDescriptor.java:65)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.lambda$executeRecursively$5(NodeTestTask.java:139)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.ThrowableCollector.execute(ThrowableCollector.java:73)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.lambda$executeRecursively$7(NodeTestTask.java:129)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.Node.around(Node.java:137)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.lambda$executeRecursively$8(NodeTestTask.java:127)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.ThrowableCollector.execute(ThrowableCollector.java:73)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.executeRecursively(NodeTestTask.java:126)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.execute(NodeTestTask.java:84)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.ForkJoinPoolHierarchicalTestExecutorService$ExclusiveTask.compute(ForkJoinPoolHierarchicalTestExecutorService.java:185)
at java.util.concurrent.RecursiveAction.exec(RecursiveAction.java:189)
at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1056)
at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1692)
at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:175)
Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No designation of local declaration public final static enum entry MyEntry: R|MyEnum|
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:192)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.components.AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest.doTestByFileStructure(AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest.kt:79)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.test.framework.AbstractHLApiSingleModuleTest.doTestByFileStructure(AbstractHLApiSingleModuleTest.kt:16)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.test.base.AbstractLowLevelApiTest.runTest(AbstractLowLevelApiTest.kt:117)
... 38 more
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No designation of local declaration public final static enum entry MyEntry: R|MyEnum|
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.api.FirDeclarationDesignationKt.collectDesignation(FirDeclarationDesignation.kt:90)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.api.LowLevelFirApiFacadeForResolveOnAir.runBodyResolveOnAir(LowLevelFirApiFacadeForResolveOnAir.kt:239)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.api.LowLevelFirApiFacadeForResolveOnAir.getResolveStateForDependentCopy(LowLevelFirApiFacadeForResolveOnAir.kt:175)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.KtFirAnalysisSession.createContextDependentCopy(KtFirAnalysisSession.kt:102)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.test.base.AbstractLowLevelApiTest.analyse(AbstractLowLevelApiTest.kt:203)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.components.AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest.access$analyse(AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest.kt:22)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.components.AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest$doTestByFileStructure$$inlined$executeOnPooledThreadInReadAction$1$1.compute(AbstractLowLevelApiTest.kt:183)
at com.intellij.mock.MockApplication.runReadAction(MockApplication.java:183)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.components.AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest$doTestByFileStructure$$inlined$executeOnPooledThreadInReadAction$1.call(AbstractLowLevelApiTest.kt:183)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:652)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:649)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1.run(Executors.java:649)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
parameters.
This was causing exceptions with analysis API trying to resolve the
synthetic FirValueParameter because it could not find a KtDeclaration
for it. Using BODY_RESOLVE should be safe; the SAM constructor function
is also on BODY_RESOLVE and the type of the value parameter is known.
Consider the following code:
```
fun test(a: List<String>) {
a.first()
}
```
The dispatch receiver type of `first` in this case is `List<T>` before
this change. After this change, it's `List<String>`.
In addition, this change also replace the dispatch receiver type with
the more specific type if available. For example, consider the following
```
class MyList: ArrayList<String>()
fun test(a: MyList) {
a.get(0)
}
```
The dispatch receiver type of `get` is `MyList`, instead of
`ArrayList<String>`. That is, a fake override is created in this case.
Anna Kozlova