Commit Graph

3538 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ilya Chernikov d5ad41fa28 K2 Scripting: add failing test for #KT-64241 2024-03-19 15:38:35 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 988edab7a0 [Tests] Add regression test for #KT-58575
#KT-58575 Fixed
2024-03-19 15:34:43 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin c7765258d1 [FIR] FirResolvePhase: introduce isItAllowedToCallLazyResolveTo
To explicitly declare when it is possible to call lazy resolve
2024-03-19 14:53:28 +00:00
Stanislav Ruban 89a0cde514 [tests][FIR][checkers] Add test data for KT-66595 2024-03-19 12:32:17 +00:00
Ilya Chernikov 0df3a37303 K2 Scripting, Fir2Ir: allow out of order supertypes declaration
fix script declarations registration logic in Fir2Ir to allow
supertypes of a class to be defined later than the class itself.

#KT-64534 fixed
2024-03-19 08:24:17 +00:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov f18aa5e70f [Test] Add regression test for KT-66638 2024-03-19 07:40:09 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh 2d755aabe7 K1/K2: add test data for KT-66356 2024-03-18 18:11:14 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 19cc739118 [Tests] Reproduce #KT-65193 2024-03-18 15:52:50 +00:00
Sergej Jaskiewicz 1476b89ea3 [build] Forward the JDK_21_0 environment variable to tests 2024-03-15 15:07:13 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 2095f90e69 [FIR] Fix exception in Java scope caused by inherited member with implicit return type
It's caused by checking the return type of an inherited property.
toConeKotlinTypeProbablyFlexible() returns an error type when the
type ref is unresolved instead of throwing.
This "breaks" some override checks and in the added test, it leads
to an additional candidate being created for a synthetic property.
However, the candidate has applicability K2_SYNTHETIC_RESOLVED
and gets filtered out because the real property has a higher
applicability.

#KT-66392 Fixed
2024-03-15 12:01:55 +00:00
Stanislav Ruban bf77cc3d0c [tests][FIR][checkers][JS] Add test data for KT-66474 2024-03-15 11:40:55 +00:00
Stanislav Ruban 24d7d8088c [tests][FIR][checkers][Wasm] Prepare for addition of KMP Wasm test data 2024-03-15 11:40:55 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh 5b0cb5c9db K2/jspecify: reproduce KT-65594 2024-03-15 09:40:53 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh cd20f31810 K2: introduce JavaTypeParameterDefaultRepresentationWithDNN exp. feature
#KT-66447 Fixed
2024-03-14 22:39:03 +00:00
Alevtina.Gamzikova 7d06b34bfa [Test] KT-64350 Add testcases 2024-03-14 20:41:53 +00:00
Sergej Jaskiewicz 9851ff1905 [FIR] Reproduce KT-66277, KT-66279, KT-66512 and KT-66534 2024-03-14 18:34:30 +00:00
Artem Kobzar eb8054ac1e [K/Wasm] Fix object optimization false trigger on non-pure objects ^KT-66471 Fixed 2024-03-14 17:12:45 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 324d2e042a Tests: do not report backend diagnostics in diagnostic tests
There's a separate test data directory `testsWithJvmBackend` with a
runner that properly invokes the JVM backend and reports diagnostics
from it. All tests where JVM diagnostic presence/absence is important
were copied/moved there in this and previous commits.

The problem with the code removed in this commit is that it invoked some
parts of the _old JVM backend_ and old light classes, which is very far
from what users see in the production compiler at this point. This led
to real issues where we implemented incorrect behavior in K2 based on
the misleading diagnostic report from the K1 test.

The diagnostic in `triangleWithFlexibleTypeAndSubstitution4.kt` was
removed, but there's a copy of this test in `codegen/box/javaInterop`
which fails for K2 (KT-66529).

The diagnostic in `intersectionWithMappedSignature.kt` was removed and
that is OK because at this point CONFLICTING_JVM_DECLARATIONS there
seems like a bug in the old JVM backend.
2024-03-14 12:38:48 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 7d6cd8d126 Tests: remove diagnostic test with incorrect compiler behavior
In fact the latest compiler (neither K1 nor K2) does NOT report an error
here, see KT-66522. The error was there in the diagnostic test because
the test used custom code which invoked parts of the old JVM backend to
report signature clash errors.

The issue is rather minor and is present since 1.5, so to reduce
confusion, the test is deleted.

 #KT-66522
2024-03-14 12:38:48 +00:00
Alexander Udalov d986e0ee9c Tests: move more diagnostic tests to testsWithJvmBackend
In this commit, tests where backend diagnostics were reported correctly
are being moved.

FirScopeDumpHandler was added to FIR diagnostic tests with JVM backend
to support `SCOPE_DUMP` in `overridesBuiltinNoMagic.kt` and
`charAtAndOverload.kt`.
2024-03-14 12:38:48 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 56a1a3153b Tests: move inline class-related diagnostic tests
... with backend-reported diagnostics to testsWithJvmBackend.
2024-03-14 12:38:47 +00:00
Alexander Udalov d08c904b0c Tests: copy diagnostic test to codegen/box
This is basically a copy of the test
`diagnostics/tests/j+k/primitiveOverrides/triangleWithFlexibleTypeAndSubstitution4.kt`.
The diagnostic version of the test is not removed because it has
frontend-specific diagnostics `FIR_DUMP` and `SCOPE_DUMP`.

This test is copied to make it clear that it actually passes in K1, and
new errors in K2 here are technically a breaking change, see KT-66529.
The error CONFLICTING_INHERITED_JVM_DECLARATIONS was present there only
because diagnostic tests used parts of the old JVM backend to report JVM
backend diagnostics.

 #KT-66529
2024-03-14 12:38:47 +00:00
Alexander Udalov c997e9f142 Tests: move diagnostic test to testsWithJvmBackend
There's a difference in behavior of K1 and K2 here, see KT-66528.

 #KT-66528
2024-03-14 12:38:46 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 81a9f5654e Tests: remove diagnostic tests which are present elsewhere
- `typeParameterWithTwoBounds.kt` is already present in
  `diagnostics/testsWithJvmBackend/duplicateJvmSignature/erasure/`.
- `clashWithCompanionObjectField.kt` is already present in
  `codegen/box/fieldRename/jvmFieldNoClash1.kt`.
- `jvmFieldAndJavaGetter.kt` is already present in
  `codegen/box/jvmField/noClashWithInheritedJavaMethod.kt`.

In case of two latter tests on JvmField, there's (correctly) no error
reported in JVM IR, which is why those are box tests.
2024-03-14 12:38:44 +00:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov c62fe0d107 [Test] Add regression test for KT-66336 2024-03-14 12:23:36 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 9f750d3036 [Tests] Reproduce current behavior of operator/infix resolution
#KT-66504
#KT-66453
#KT-58260
2024-03-14 11:32:38 +00:00
Nikita Bobko a8275c99a3 [FIR, IR] Check for strict subtypes during actualization
^KT-65775 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/14906/timeline
2024-03-14 10:53:43 +00:00
Aleksandra.Arsenteva 83d0e1f447 [Test] KT-66152 Add tests for generic static function 2024-03-14 10:16:46 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 786c37286c [FIR] Fix crash caused by cast of raw type to simple type
#KT-66552 Fixed
2024-03-14 08:42:20 +00:00
Mads Ager b0bc017a16 [Parcelize] Add test for parcelize in multiplatform setting.
This tests that classes in common code can have code generated
for them in android compilations.
2024-03-14 06:52:19 +00:00
Mads Ager 5f971d6d9d [Test] Don't fail on metadata errors in fir based codegen tests 2024-03-14 06:52:18 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh d6e67e43f9 K1/K2: add a test for KT-62866 2024-03-13 14:57:34 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh 3b9e08d6b8 K1/K2: reproduce KT-65789 2024-03-13 14:57:33 +00:00
Roman Efremov c4f89ab32e [Test] Add test reproducing incorrect error in K2 about super qualifier
...with type arguments.
Also, add lazy resolve test to check the subsequent changes are correct.

^KT-66150
2024-03-13 14:31:14 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 43a08068fc [Tests] Add regression tests for KT-32754
#KT-32754 Fixed
2024-03-13 12:39:54 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 55f9f74d5c Tests: do not report backend diagnostics if there's frontend error
In most affected tests, the backend diagnostic such as "conflicting JVM
signature" or "accidental override" is directly caused by some already
existing error reported by frontend, so it doesn't make sense to check
backend diagnostics there.

Tests where that was not the case were moved/copied to
`testsWithJvmBackend`.
2024-03-13 08:38:15 +00:00
Alexander Udalov dca6c21d7f Tests: remove duplicateJvmSignature diagnostic tests
All of these tests were actually copied to `testsWithJvmBackend` in
866f188120, but it's unclear why they were copied instead of moved. The
test runner for `testsWithJvmBackend` correctly runs the compiler
pipeline and obtains errors reported by the backend, as opposed to the
common diagnostic tests which have a very custom code, using parts of
the old JVM backend, to obtain these diagnostics.
2024-03-13 08:38:15 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 6ed06f4dac Tests: minor, move diagnostic test missingNames.kt
Looks like it was placed in the `duplicateJvmSignature` directory by
mistake.
2024-03-13 08:38:14 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 5be1ff1d5f Tests: minor, remove obsolete diagnostic tests
- `require.kt` was added to check JVM accidental override diagnostic
  when using the "traits with required classes" feature, which was
  removed a long time ago.
- `withErrorTypes.kt` was testing conflicting JVM declarations error (a
  backend diagnostic) in presence of error types -- not very useful
  scenario because the backend is not run when there's a frontend error.
2024-03-13 08:38:14 +00:00
Vladimir Sukharev 5fee662223 [Tests] Add test for KT-57391
^KT-57391
2024-03-12 18:10:10 +00:00
Nikolay Lunyak d3dfbec01a [FIR] Report warnings for inconsistent visibilities of accessors
K1 didn't report diagnostics for accessors
of intersection overrides, so this change
prevents a BC.

^KT-66046 Fixed
2024-03-12 16:35:05 +00:00
Nikolay Lunyak daa6e03e3b [FIR] Reproduce KT-66046
^KT-66046
2024-03-12 16:35:05 +00:00
Brian Norman c6c0abae82 [FIR] Create test case to validate KT-56988 is working as expected
^KT-56988 Fixed
2024-03-12 14:48:39 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 973e337bf5 [FIR] Enhance getter overrides based on overridden properties
The following tests are failing with exceptions and will be fixed in the
following commits

j+k/testKjkPropertyAndExtensionProperty.kt
j+k/testKjkImplicitReturnType.kt

#KT-62118 Fixed
2024-03-12 10:29:45 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 888cac6fc0 [Tests] Reproduce #KT-66048 2024-03-12 10:29:45 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 29a9d3cdd9 [FIR] Fix copy paste error in receiver enhancement 2024-03-12 10:29:44 +00:00
Vladimir Sukharev aa1cce78c3 [FIR] Incorrect warnings about inline function impact
^KT-65959 Fixed
2024-03-12 10:26:23 +00:00
Denis.Zharkov 141be17b4b K2: Add some more tests showing the state for KT-64840
lambdaParameterForBareTypeEarlyFixationAffectsBehavior.kt
should show in the future commits how early variable fixation
necessary for bare type information might affect inference results

^KT-64840 Related
2024-03-12 10:22:11 +00:00
Ivan Kylchik e1180adfbd [Native] Always cast expression to the expected type after inline
Right now, during the process of inlining, the compiler erases types.
Because of that, we can end up with some random type
(for example, `Any`) where the concrete type was
expected (for example, `Int`). Compiler must insert a cast in the
required places.

#KT-66017 Fixed
2024-03-12 08:19:50 +00:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov 7a383373b0 [Test] Reproduce KT-65415 and KT-66432 2024-03-12 06:46:09 +00:00