Result of calling `ExpressionCodegen.gen` was used only in two call
sites in the inliner. In all other call sites, we were doing unnecessary
work (and sometimes were even failing) by trying to construct a
KotlinType instance out from an IrType.
Note that even though the code from KT-50617 no longer fails to compile,
the underlying problem is still not solved, since the IrType for foo's
dispatch receiver is constructed incorrectly. The reason is that
SymbolTable links everything by IdSignature, which is identical for
classes with the same FQ name.
#KT-50617 Fixed
Make addArgument/addElement/putElement extension functions. This will
simplify transition to auto-generated IR.
Co-authored-by: mcpiroman <mcpiroman@gmail.com>
Previously enhanced symbols were cached inside SignatureEnhancement,
which is created independently for each enhancement scope. This may
cause creation of multiple enhanced symbols for same java declaration
in presence of multiple scope sessions (mutithread compiler, IDE,
separate scope session for checkers)
^KT-50858 Fixed
This big refactoring is needed to cleanup building of overrides
mappings and prevent creating redundant intersection overrides in
cases when there is no need in them:
```kotlin
interface A {
fun foo()
}
interface B {
fun foo()
}
interface C : A, B {
override fun foo()
}
```
Before this refactoring there was next override tree:
C.foo
intersection override (A.foo, B.foo)
A.foo
B.foo
Also this commit fixes special mapping of overrides in jvm scopes
for declarations which have kotlin builtins in supertypes with
special java mapping rules (collections, for example)
This is much more correct, because we have one to one mapping for
special java functions in this case, so using single nullable name
instead of list of names makes code more readable
It's safe as not having const is more restrictive, therefore can be
allowed in common. Otherwise, it's not possible to declare an expect
declaration for a platform property with `const` modifier in common
KT-18856
If there is a `coneType` call immediately after the `fir.bounds` call,
it means that the fully resolved type is expected, hence
`resolvedBounds` should be used
Mikhail Glukhikh