Implicit receiver type inside expect class is inconsistent with the
type resolved from an explicit reference inside that class. The former
one is a default class type, i.e. expect; the latter one resolves to
an actual type when either expect and actual are in the same module, or
when the sources are compiled for a particular platform.
The workaround is to manually actualize implicit receiver type for one
particular check affected by the broken subtyping.
KT-49714
Previously (few commits earlier), it contained two versions
of receiver (lhs) generated separately for each desugaring version
that looked a bit redundant.
Now, at FIR building stage we just don't create desugaring sub-trees,
instead they are being built during bodies transformation and that seems
to be much convenient there, since we don't need to reverse-engineer
get-set-operator version to check if containing calls are successful
(as we just built those calls and retain them)
Semantically, this changes may only change how data flow works
for such statements (see changed compatibilityResolveWithVarargAndOperatorCall.kt)
^KT-50861 Relates
In this commit we upgrade FIR builder inference logic from
the compiler version to 1.7. FIR-based compiler now works with
"don't use builder inference" flag always ON and supports switching
the flag "use builder inference only if needed". To do it,
ContraintSystemCompleter (FIR) and KotlinConstraintSystemCompleter (FE 1.0)
are made similar with extracting some common parts into
ConstraintSystemCompletionContext.
Test status: one BB test fails after this commit (KT-49285).
Also we have a crush in DFA logic in FIR bootstrap test and somehow
questionable behavior in FIR diagnostic test. However,
two BB tests were fixed, the 3rd case from KT-49925 were also fixed.
#KT-49925 Fixed
This big refactoring is needed to cleanup building of overrides
mappings and prevent creating redundant intersection overrides in
cases when there is no need in them:
```kotlin
interface A {
fun foo()
}
interface B {
fun foo()
}
interface C : A, B {
override fun foo()
}
```
Before this refactoring there was next override tree:
C.foo
intersection override (A.foo, B.foo)
A.foo
B.foo
Also this commit fixes special mapping of overrides in jvm scopes
for declarations which have kotlin builtins in supertypes with
special java mapping rules (collections, for example)
Victor Petukhov