When we have some custom implementation of Comparable, it's important
that we compare values exactly as 'lowBound <= a && a <= highBound'.
Make sure that evaluation order and compareTo calls match for
optimized and non-optimized case.
As of Kotlin 1.0 and 1.1, expression 'a in x .. y' is considered
equivalent to 'x.rangeTo(y).a', and should be evaluated in the following
order:
1. x
2. y
3. a
4. compare x with a
5. compare y with a (if needed)
It's safe to upcast integer types to Long,
floating-point types to Double.
So we don't have to create a range instance for cases such as
fun testLongInInt(x: Long, a: Int, b: Int) =
x in a .. b
which is equivalent to
fun testLongInInt(x: Long, a: Int, b: Int) =
x in a.toLong() .. b.toLong()
DUP_X1; POP = SWAP
p1_a; p1_b; SWAP = p1_b; p1_a
where p1_a, p1_b are instructions without side effects pushing value of
size 1 on stack.
E.g.: ACONST_NULL; ALOAD 0; SWAP = ALOAD 0; ACONST_NULL
NOP; NOP = NOP
Provide BoundedValue-based implementation of InExpressionGenerator,
test it on range of comparable values.
Drop unneeded test (range of comparables is already tested by
ranges/contains/inComparableRanges.kt).
There's a subtle difference in behavior between comparing
primitive Float/Double (comparison follows IEEE standard)
and boxed Float/Double (comparison is a total order).
Make sure this corner case is preserved.
No package annotations are going to be loaded, and
TypeQualifierDefault/TypeQualifierNickname are no longer recognized by
default. Use the CLI argument "-Xload-jsr305-annotations" to enable this
behavior back
#KT-10942
Ensure that messages reported on a file but with no line information are
reported before diagnostics related to code. This fixes
Java9ModulesIntegrationTest.testSeveralModulesWithTheSameName on some
machines
It was only used for type-related nullability/mutability
annotations and it was necessary to remove them
in the descriptor renderer (duplicating their fqnames there).
At the same time they're only needed for types enhancement
where they can be simply restored from type owners' descriptors
The testData changes are more or less correct: this kind of annotations
is bound both to types themselves and their use because of their targets
As the type is anyway replaced with not-nullable version
explicitly, the only thing that changes is what type is loaded
for String[][].class:
- before it would be Array<Array<String?>?>
- now it's Array<(out) Array<(out) String!>!>
It's both a minor change and new behaviour can be considered
as correct
Alexander Udalov