Before, BODY_RESOLVE phase were used for them but status may be unresolved.
This caused CCE on accessing resolved status for such static enum members.
Now, those declarations are created with the status of owning enum as the status is taken from that class.
See: compiler/testData/asJava/lightClasses/
AnnotatedParameterInInnerClassConstructor.kt
The muted tests don't work with the (KT-53371, KT-53519)-related
changes. During this test happens an attempt to access unresolved
annotations via CustomAnnotationTypeAttribute.
Discussion: KTIJ-23547
Right now it is the easiest way to ensure that all the parameters are
resolved. After KT-53573 is fixed, we might use `resolvedReturnTypeRef`
on each parameter individually instead
Also, add `toString` implementation to `ValueClassRepresentation`
classes, so they are properly rendered in testdata
^KTIJ-22630 Fixed
Before this commit, we added Enum.entries only in case when
LanguageFeature.EnumEntries was ON (with an exception in K1/Java case).
In this commit we add Enum.entries unconditionally, and in case
the language feature is OFF we filter them out during tower resolve.
If we want to analyse some function's call, we need to know about its
contracts, otherwise resolving the following code would be broken.
Computing return type of function is a prerequisite to using it in any
sensible way, so it's the best place to resolve it to CONTRACTS
KT-50733
We are going to deprecate `WITH_RUNTIME` directive. The main reason
behind this change is that `WITH_STDLIB` directive better describes
its meaning, specifically it will add kotlin stdlib to test's classpath.
KtEnumEntry, a subtype of KtClass, has been handled by
findNonLocalClass. Since KtEnumEntry doesn't have class id, that util
always throws an error while retrieving class id.
Instead, we should use containing class (i.e., enum class) id.
Also, once the enum class is resolved, we should search for matching
enum entry inside the enum class.
1. Inner class constructor should have its outer class as a dispatch
receiver, since it is necessary for the call. Before it was null
2. Substituted inner class constructor should have its original dispatch
receiver type with the proper substitution. Before it was set to the
class itself (since the class was usually passed as a new dispatch
receiver)
Also, modify FIR renderer, so it properly renders the dispatch receiver
of the constructors
Consider the following code:
```
fun test(a: List<String>) {
a.first()
}
```
The dispatch receiver type of `first` in this case is `List<T>` before
this change. After this change, it's `List<String>`.
In addition, this change also replace the dispatch receiver type with
the more specific type if available. For example, consider the following
```
class MyList: ArrayList<String>()
fun test(a: MyList) {
a.get(0)
}
```
The dispatch receiver type of `get` is `MyList`, instead of
`ArrayList<String>`. That is, a fake override is created in this case.
Ilya Kirillov