See callingOuterGenericClassConstructorWithSelfTypes.kt
Previously, for A<B>(""), we used substituted constructor
where `X` was substituted with `B` (or `A<X>.B`).
But when resolving the call for constructor, we use `X`
as a type variable of the call, thus in some positions
we used `X` as TV (Xv in the comments) and somewhere `X` as a type
parameter, thus leading to contradictions (see clarifying comment).
The idea of the fix is simply repeating of the regular (not delegated)
constructor call resolution:
- We substitute only type parameters of outer class
- All the declared parameters of the callee are being checked
through regular resolution & inference mechanisms.
NB: Diagnostic only being reported on arguments because there
when we add `String <: Any` constraint it fails due to existing
contradiction in the CS.
Without the argument/parameter the error is just being lost, but that's
a different story (seeKT-65224).
^KT-64841 Fixed
Although these dumps don't really show if
something is a `FirFunctionCall` or a
`FirImplicitInvokeCall`, they do show what
goes into the receiver, and what are value
arguments.
In more details, we use either platform override checker (if we came
from platform) or the combined intersection scope override checker
at this place. Also this commit fixes various places around
JavaOverrideChecker, allowing to apply it in intersection override
checker properly:
- don't consider return types in this place
- apply JavaOverrideChecker if at least one candidate is from Java
- compare type primitivity closer to K1 logic
#KT-62554 Fixed
Partially fixes KT-63242
The primary constructor of a class needs to be the first subgraph of the
class control-flow graph. Based on the Kotlin specification, class
initialization order goes first primary constructor, in-place
declarations (properties and init blocks), and then secondary
constructors. If the class doesn't have a primary constructor, then it
is just skipped in the order.
Unfortunately, the class control-flow graph had in-place declarations
first and then all constructors. Instead, we should treat the primary
constructor as the first in-place declaration, and then continue with
the existing processing as secondary constructors. This will guarantee
that super constructor calls have the correct property initialization
information.
^KT-65093 Fixed
When using a field as the delegate for a super-interface of an object,
make sure uninitialized fields are not allowed. Specifically, disallow
access to these fields when referenced via object qualifier.
^KT-56489 Fixed
...by honoring accessors' visibility
We need a special handling for backing field visibility,
e.g., lateinit, const, or JvmField, but that's not the case
for accessors' visibility.
^KT-64937 fixed
- Fix a false positive JS_NAME_CLASH report on constructors
from different classes but with the same JsName.
- Allow the same JsName for class constructors and other top-level
declarations. This behavior differs from K1, but it is correct
since there is no real name clash in the generated JS code.
^KT-64867 Fixed
Evgeniy.Zhelenskiy