NB: in order to produce correct IR origins, the source element kinds for
some FIR elements has been changed. As a side effect, mapping PSI to FIR
slightly changed: namely, for `a[b]++`, `a[b]` used to be mapped on
`set` call or callable reference, but now it is mapped on `get` call.
^KT-61891: Fixed
^KT-64387: Fixed
While not beeing final solution, this is closer to what
we want to have in the end. Enabling on non-JVM targets
would help better testing.
Enabling in JVM is now not possible yet, as some of the bugs are
not fixed yet (check KT-61360 for details)
^KT-62476
Rework rendering of kt-like dump and signatures dump in order to avoid
unstable blank line between declarations of the same level:
1. No blank line for the first declaration inside the member scope of
the class.
2. Always a single blank line between each two subsequent declarations
inside the member scope of the class.
Properties of type dynamic within a data class cause compilation to fail
when converting FIR to IR. This is because dynamic types do not have a
proper backing class for symbol lookup. However, dynamic types can just
be considered of type Any for hashCode calculations.
^KT-63094 Fixed
If some function is not fake-override, then its type should be just
default type of containing class
For fake overrides the default type calculated in the following way:
1. Find first overridden function, which is not fake override
2. Take its containing class
3. Find supertype of current containing class with type constructor of
class from step 2
^KT-60252 Fixed
This doesn't reduce the quality of tests, because the flags are still
printed for declarations themselves. We only omit them in references.
However, this makes the tests more compatible with non-JVM backends
(see KT-58605), because flags of referenced stdlib declarations may
differ among target platforms.
The reason #1 for this feature is that we want to test IdSignatures
generated for declarations. Currently, there is no (easy) way to ensure
that a change in the signature building logic doesn't cause any breaking
changes wrt klibs.
Now, most IdSignatures include hashed mangled names in them, so even if
we catch a regression where the included hash changes, there would be no
way of knowing immediately what caused it, unless we'd also have mangled
names in the expectations.
The reason #2 is to test the manglers themselves. Currently, there are
no tests for them. They heavily duplicate each other, this is already
causing issues (see KT-57427) that would be very hard to catch without
these tests.
^KT-58238 Fixed
The constructor with the required parameters may
not have been defined, and since JS/IR box tests
pass, it seems, we don't have to resolve
into anything meaningful. We could generate
the appropriate constructor like dynamic type
members are generated, but, again, K1 IR doesn't
even contain a delegating constructor call.
^KT-57809 Fixed
Pavel Kunyavskiy