Even though SO may not be correct
overrides sometimes, it feels more
natural to treat fake overrides as...
well, "overrides". And without it
we'd need to make the code in
`FirOverrideChecker` less intuitive.
NB: in order to produce correct IR origins, the source element kinds for
some FIR elements has been changed. As a side effect, mapping PSI to FIR
slightly changed: namely, for `a[b]++`, `a[b]` used to be mapped on
`set` call or callable reference, but now it is mapped on `get` call.
^KT-61891: Fixed
^KT-64387: Fixed
When encountering multiple available same named types,
resolve all of them together with corresponding extensions.
This aligns well with the current resolve behavior of classes
with the same name (see `SameNameClassesFromStarImports.kt`)
Also, add extra test for resolving the ambiguous type without
the extension function. The behavior is the same - resolve to the
both classes.
Render caret names in resolve testData, so that we don't have to guess
the indices of the carets;
it makes the multi-caret testData less error-prone.
Relevant for KT-65152 and KT-62695
The solution is not complete, since resolution of KDocs is not
fully specified and is rather tricky.
Many more corner cases are to be expected.
This solution should at least give some groundwork for the future
improvements/fixes of the resolver.
^KT-62695 Fixed
Make sure that, when ambiguous, both the package
and the callable/class/property are resolved from
KDoc reference.
Do a slight refactoring of `KDocReferenceResolver`
This behavior is also true for K1
Allow multiple carets to be used in reference resolve tests.
Adjust the testdata for the only test case which has actually
had multiple carets in it.
Required for KT-65152 and KT-62695
Instead of relying on UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE directive for the whole file,
just render the unresolved reference right in the .txt testdata
This will allow to introduce multi-caret resolve testdata more naturally
Required for KT-65152 and KT-62695
- This adds KDoc reference resolution tests for callables in nested and
inner classes, overloaded functions, and private callables.
- Private declarations are visible in KDoc from outside their containing
classes. This is in line with K1 KDoc behavior.
^KTIJ-22324
`FirSafeCallExpression` does not implement `FirResolvable`, so we need
to unwrap it to correctly resolve calls like `foo?.bar()` when `bar` is
a lambda with receiver parameter or a functional type property
^KTIJ-27434 Fixed
This commit also fixes a missing symbol for KtScriptInitializer
and some symbol pointers
Many tests marked as 'DO_NOT_CHECK_NON_PSI_SYMBOL_RESTORE'
due to KtFirFileSymbol#createPointer logic – the pointer can
be created only for PSI
^KT-61451
^KT-61887
^KT-62626 Fixed
^KT-62693
To properly resolve qualifier parts in the middle,
we need to resolve the whole qualifier to understand
which parts of the qualifier are package or class qualifiers.
And then we will be able to resolve the qualifier
selected by the user to the proper class, package or callable.
^KT-59189
1. Optimize it by removing a tower data context collection (KT-59189)
2. Rework the behavior, so it simulates the tower resolve by returning the set of symbols only from the first tower level, which is not empty
^KT-59189 fixed
It's very slow and leads to performance problems (see KT-58125)
Instead, we do the following:
- For a fully resolved type qualifier, when we want to resolve its part,
we are looking for the corresponding symbol by traversing nested classes
bottom up.
- For an error qualifier, we are trying to resolve the maximum possible
qualifier in the types transformer where all the type scopes are
already available.
^KT-58125 fixed
The change is needed for the parallel resolution (^KT-55750), so we can resolve the declaration
under a lock that is specific to this declaration.
Previously, if LL FIR was resolving some FirClass, LL FIR resolved all its children too, and it had no control over what parts of the FIR tree were modified.
The same applied to the designation path, sometimes the classes on the designation path
might be unexpectedly (and without lock) modified.
This commit introduces LLFirResolveTarget, which specifies which exact declarations should be resolved during the lazy resolution of the declaration.
All elements outside the declarations specified for resolve in LLFirResolveTarget, should not be modified.
The logic of lazy transformers is the following:
- Go to target declaration collecting all scopes from the file and containing classes
- Resolve only declarations that are specified by the LLFirResolveTarget, performing the resolve under a separate lock for each declaration
^KT-56543
^KT-57619 Fixed
- KTIJ-24574 occurred because a local destructuring declaration was
erroneously returned as the non-local containing declaration of an
element by `getNonLocalContainingOrThisDeclaration`. This occurred in
`init` blocks.
KTIJ-24574 fixed
FirReferenceResolveHelper internally checks whether the referenced class
id matches the qualifed access or not. If they do not match, it reports
an error. When the companion object has the same name as the class,
resolving a qualified expression access to a member of the companion
object causes an error because of the mismatch e.g.,
```
package my.sample
class Test {
fun a() {
my.sample.<caret>Test.say()
}
companion object Test {
fun say() {}
}
}
```
This commit fixes the issue.
TODO: When the companion object has a name difference from class, it
does not report an error but the resolution result is wrong in FIR. See
KT-56167.
---
Commentary from rebaser: the issue mentioned in this code is
fixed in 71a368e06e, so the actual
fix is omitted, and only test data is preserved
Nikolay Lunyak