Simplify ifs when branches have condition true/false.
Simplify blocks containing only a variable declaration
and a variable get of the same variable. Simplify to
just the condition.
Do not introduce temporary variables for constants for
null checks. Constants have no side-effects and can be
reloaded freely instead of going through a local.
This simplifies code such as "42.toLong()!!" so that the
resulting code has no branches and uses no locals. The
simplifications happen as follows:
```
block
temp = 42.toLong()
when
(temp == null) throw NPE
(true) load temp
---> null test simplification
block
temp = 42.toLong()
when
(false) throw NPE
(true) load temp
---> when simplification
block
temp = 42.toLong()
load temp
---> block simplification
42.toLong()
```
In case of the same class defined in different modules they contain
different descriptors instances in their scope that might lead
to failing assertion in findConcreteSuperDeclaration
because there are overridden from different modules
It might happen even in the compiler because of different built-in modules
defined for sources-module and for dependencies' one
^KT-29320 Fixed
In super class constructor arguments, 'this' can be resolved
as a reference to a companion object of a superclass.
This breaks an assumption in psi2ir that 'this' can only refer to some
receiver from the current scope.
If 'this' refers to an 'object' (including 'companion obejct'),
and we are not inside the corresponding class scope,
then 'this' represents a reference to a singleton instance "by name"
(represented as IrGetObjectValue).
Introduce lowering to remove null checks for primitive type
expressions and replace them with true/false. Side-effects
are preserved.
Generate ifnull/ifnonnull instructions for null checks instead
of materializing a null literal for an equality check.
In case we extending some Map specialization with non-trivial type arguments,
e.g. Map<String, String> from Kotlin point-of-view it has
"remove(String, String)" signature while in Java it's "remove(Object, Object)".
So, we generate an override "remove(String, String)" in first Kotlin class of the hierarchy,
which body delegates to "super.remove(Object, Object)"
Also, we generate a final override for "remove(Object, Object)" to allow
for Java inheritors choose only the version with String while overriding.
The main idea of the fix is to make mayBeUsedAsSuperImplementation
return true in case of PlatformDependent annotations.
Otherwise, we weren't able to choose the impl from the java.util.Map
as a delegate in our bridge.
Another part of the fix is overriding `isDeclaration`:
it was necessary because otherwise bridge-generation algorithm
was assuming that there's already an actual declaration
in the first sub-class (TestMap) in the test and we need to
delegate to the latter instead of the method from the interface
^KT-26069 Fixed
Proper SMAP support for default values from expect declarations is required.
Default value in expect declaration could has line number that
exceed line count in actual file that causes an error
#KT-23739 Fixed
#KT-29174 Open
Original problem is that lowered ir closures doesn't meet inliner expectations
about captured variable position in inlining method.
E.g.: Call 'foo(valueParam) { capturedParam }' to
inline function 'foo' with declaration
inline fun foo(valueParam: Foo, inlineParamWithCaptured: Bar.() ->) ....
is reorganized through inlining to equivalent call foo(valueParam, capturedParam1, cp2 ...).
But lowered closure for lambda parameter has totally different parameters order:
fun loweredLambda$x(extensionReceiver, captured1, cp2..., valueParam1, vp2...)
So before inlining lowered closure should be transformed to
fun loweredLambda$x(extensionReceiver, valueParam1, vp2..., captured1, cp2..)
#KT-28547 Fixed
For the inline class:
```
inline class IC(val x: Int)
```
Type (IC..IC?) should be mapped to the wrapper `IC`
because it can hold object and also because it does so for primitives
#KT-28983 Fixed
Denis Zharkov