This directive anyway does not make test run twice with OI, and with NI
It only once run the test with specific settings (// LANGUAGE)
and ignores irrelevant (OI or NI tags)
Previously if an unsafe call is to an overloaded function, FIR checkers
report NONE_APPLICABLE. This change instead report them as UNSAFE_CALL
or its variants.
Previously unsafe call is reported as part of InapplicableWrongReceiver.
This makes it difficult for the downstream checkers to report different
diagnostics.
Specifically, the report the following 4 errors.
* NON_VARARG_SPREAD
* ARGUMENT_PASSED_TWICE
* TOO_MANY_ARGUMENTS
* NO_VALUE_FOR_PARAMETER
Also added/updated the following position strategies.
* NAME_OF_NAMED_ARGUMENT
* VALUE_ARGUMENTS
Currently, FIR reports errors caused by previous resolution failure. For
example with unresolved `a` and `b` in code `a.b`, both `a` and `b` are
highlighted. FE1.0 only highlights `a` since it's the root cause. This
change applies this heuristics when reporting FirDiagnostics.
Currently if there is an error in a function call, FIR would report the
entire expression if this call is qualified, but *only* the name if it's
not qualified. For example, assume the following two calls are all
contains some errors.
```
a.foo(1,2,3)
^^^^^^^^^^^^
bar(1,2,3)
^^^
```
The entire call of `foo` is reported since it's qualified. But only the
reference `bar` is reported since it's not qualified. This limits the
usage of position strategies because the IDE does not allow position
strategies to go outside of the initially reported PSI element
(org.jetbrains.kotlin.idea.fir.highlighter.KotlinHighLevelDiagnosticHighlightingPass#addDiagnostic).
This change passes both the original error named reference and the
surrounding qualified access expression and defer the decision of which
to use to the reporting logic.
For unresolved reference and checks on `super` keyword, the position
strategy should not highlight the surrounding parentheses. Hence a new
position strategy `REFERENCED_NAME_BY_QUALIFIED` is added.
In addition, this change also has the following side effect
* some diagnostics are no longer reported when there is a syntax error
since the higher level structure does not exist when there is a syntax
error
To do so, inside the root cause of inapplicable candidate errors,
we will record expected/actual type of receiver, if any.
That will help identifying inapplicable calls on nullable receiver.
Andrey Zinovyev