The change is needed for the parallel resolution (^KT-55750), so we can resolve the declaration
under a lock that is specific to this declaration.
Previously, if LL FIR was resolving some FirClass, LL FIR resolved all its children too, and it had no control over what parts of the FIR tree were modified.
The same applied to the designation path, sometimes the classes on the designation path
might be unexpectedly (and without lock) modified.
This commit introduces LLFirResolveTarget, which specifies which exact declarations should be resolved during the lazy resolution of the declaration.
All elements outside the declarations specified for resolve in LLFirResolveTarget, should not be modified.
The logic of lazy transformers is the following:
- Go to target declaration collecting all scopes from the file and containing classes
- Resolve only declarations that are specified by the LLFirResolveTarget, performing the resolve under a separate lock for each declaration
^KT-56543
^KT-57619 Fixed
^ KTIJ-24385
Temp property to store receiver is generated for `a.b++` expression.
If this property's psi corresponds to receiver expr, then FirProperty
would be found by mapper if receiver is requested.
It works unexpectedly, because FirProperty is normally not expected by expression.
This change set fake sources for generated FirProperty, so it won't be found
by source psi
ensure fir annotations are included in FirDanglingModifierList and resolved,
dedicated DanglingTopLevelModifierListStructureElement exists for top
level lists only, class level lists are processed by containing structure
element
k1 would suggest `get` as well
but with current fir structure with fake desugaring
get is moved to the separate fake psi which doesn't exist
thus the problem is ignored for now
^ KTIJ-24025
KtEnumEntry, a subtype of KtClass, has been handled by
findNonLocalClass. Since KtEnumEntry doesn't have class id, that util
always throws an error while retrieving class id.
Instead, we should use containing class (i.e., enum class) id.
Also, once the enum class is resolved, we should search for matching
enum entry inside the enum class.
Consider the following code:
```
fun test(a: List<String>) {
a.first()
}
```
The dispatch receiver type of `first` in this case is `List<T>` before
this change. After this change, it's `List<String>`.
In addition, this change also replace the dispatch receiver type with
the more specific type if available. For example, consider the following
```
class MyList: ArrayList<String>()
fun test(a: MyList) {
a.get(0)
}
```
The dispatch receiver type of `get` is `MyList`, instead of
`ArrayList<String>`. That is, a fake override is created in this case.
Kirill Rakhman