The fresh version of intellij has all record-related declarations,
so an additional fake constructor leads to errors like
KTIJ-25364 (OVERLOAD_RESOLUTION_AMBIGUITY)
^KTIJ-25366 Fixed
^KTIJ-25364 Fixed
^KTIJ-25368 Fixed
^KTIJ-25370 Fixed
The error occurs when completing the
call for the outer synthetic call
`ACCEPT_SPECIFIC_TYPE`. The error
is saved into the CS of this outer
candidate, which leads to its
callable reference to be an error
reference, but since such calls are
not parts of the FIR tree, we never
collect such errors.
^Fixed KT-59233
NB: In general, it's unclear what to do in cases
like the following one, even when sometimes
we could, indeed, prefer something:
```
fun foo(a: Int, b: String, c: Boolean)
fun foo(b: String, c: Boolean, a: Int)
foo(c = false, b = "", a = 0)
```
^KT-55933 Fixed
In K1 (see LazyImportScope), default start import with different
priority worked as follows:
- if something is found in HIGH, don't look at LOW
- otherwise, look at LOW
That, in particular, helped to avoid looking into JDK mirroring classes'
constructors like when resolving calls like String(...) because we
just don't look into j.l.String while already found kotlin.String
The change inside FirTowerResolveTask.kt is not made accidentally:
- At first, it's more or less obviously a bug fix because tower group
for hide-members candidate with implicit receiver should take into
account the tower level of the receiver itself.
- The change is attached to this commit because otherwise the test
at compiler/testData/diagnostics/testsWithStdLib/kt55503.kt starts
failing.
The bug was hidden because previously after finding a successful
`Sequence.forEach` candidate for the inner receiver
(at the default HIGH star import scope), resolver was continuing to
look into default LOW star import scope where it's frozen forever because
we had the better/closer candidate anyway.
But after this change with merging default star imports into the same
tower leve, resolver was continuing its job, enumerating implicit
receivers, finding List<Int> there and noticing that there's
a TopPrioritized hide-member candidates for them
(erroneously ignoring it has a worse/more far receiver).
^KT-51670 Fixed
- At first, get rid of a kind of interceptTowerGroup callback and use
explicit towerGroup construction instead
- Get rid of INVOKE_RECEIVER (not sure exactly why it was needed)
- Make comparison consistent with tower-levels priority of K2
(see the comments in the compareTo code)
^KT-37375 Fixed
^KT-58940 Open
Dmitrii Gridin