NB: In general, it's unclear what to do in cases
like the following one, even when sometimes
we could, indeed, prefer something:
```
fun foo(a: Int, b: String, c: Boolean)
fun foo(b: String, c: Boolean, a: Int)
foo(c = false, b = "", a = 0)
```
^KT-55933 Fixed
Previously, when a candidate was found with an applicability that is
better than the current best applicability, all previous candidates were
thrown away. Now we keep them, unless the new applicability is
successful. If no successful candidates are found, we fully resolve all
the unsuccessful ones and select the ones with the least bad
applicability. This improves diagnostics for unresolved calls.
#KT-57844 Fixed
This change allows to revert adding `WITH_STDLIB` directive
to tests which happened at `a9343aeb`.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Udalov <Alexander.Udalov@jetbrains.com>
The idea is that when we have successful candidates both from smart cast
and original type, we should discriminate in the favor of former ones.
While this problem (see kt55722.kt) existed before this branch is merged,
initially it was recognized on FP Ultimate when we stopped assuming
captured types from the same projections as equal (see kt55722Initial.kt).
^KT-55722 Fixed
^KT-55024 Fixed
^KT-56283 Related
^KT-56310 Related
The constraint system for the old type inference is going to be removed.
Also, `CONSTRAINT_SYSTEM_FOR_OVERLOAD_RESOLUTION` isn't used in the production
* Change 1.6 to 1.7 constants
* Fix SAFE_CALL_WILL_CHANGE_NULLABILITY for testData
* Change EXPOSED_PROPERTY_TYPE_IN_CONSTRUCTOR_WARNING to EXPOSED_PROPERTY_TYPE_IN_CONSTRUCTOR_ERROR
* Change NON_EXHAUSTIVE_WHEN_STATEMENT to NO_ELSE_IN_WHEN
* Fix testData for SafeCallsAreAlwaysNullable
* Change T -> T & Any in test dumps
* Change INVALID_CHARACTERS_NATIVE_WARNING -> INVALID_CHARACTERS_NATIVE_ERROR
* TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM_WARNING -> TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM_ERROR
ProhibitAssigningSingleElementsToVarargsInNamedForm is enabled from 1.3
so there is no need to make FIR accepting single element passed through
named arguments.
In addition, we may want to report only
ASSIGNING_SINGLE_ELEMENT_TO_VARARG_IN_NAMED_FORM_FUNCTION and not arg
type mismatch. But FE1.0 is reporting both so I am following it. If we
want to remove the redundant report, we will probably want to remove
FirNamedVarargChecker and report during resolution as a cone diagnostic.
This directive anyway does not make test run twice with OI, and with NI
It only once run the test with specific settings (// LANGUAGE)
and ignores irrelevant (OI or NI tags)
Update includes:
- Changing syntax of `OI/`NI` tags from `<!NI;TAG!>` to `<!TAG{NI}!>`
- Fix some incorrect directives
- Change order of diagnostics in some places
- Remove ignored diagnostics from FIR test data (previously `DIAGNOSTICS` didn't work)
- Update FIR dumps in some places and add `FIR_IDENTICAL` if needed
- Replace all JAVAC_SKIP with SKIP_JAVAC directive
#KT-36247 fixed
A lot of testdata changed because significanly less (error) descriptors
are created for unresolved types, so diagnostics became different.
This problem is only relevant when isTypeRefinementEnabled == true (HMPP projects)
Ambiguity accidentally was removed after 471134d
There, for areCallableDescriptorsEquivalent we stopped assuming
as impossible a situation of having identity-different descriptors
in the same containing declaraton that still might be considered equal
So, before 471134d we were comparing
"fun foo(x: String)" with "[substituted] fun foo(x: String)"
and areCallableDescriptorsEquivalent returned false for such case.
Thus, both overrides were left in the resulting set.
After 471134d, those two descriptors
becamed considered as equal thus having a possibility to remove any of them.
The problem is that "areCallableDescriptorsEquivalent" has kind of
unclear contract. Effectively it checks whether two descriptors match
to the same declaration.
But some of the usages expect that it also makes sure that descriptors
have the same substitution (see org.jetbrains.kotlin.resolve.calls.smartcasts.IdentifierInfo.Variable#equals)
So, the straight solution is using original descriptors for the cases
where we need to make sure that descriptors relates to actually different
declarations
^KT-34027 Fixed
This commit doesn't change behaviour of any inference algorithm, it
introduces opportunity to switch constraint system that is used for
overload resolution and fix problematic cases by changing one enum
entry.
Due to fundamental changes, there are cases where a new inference
algorithm reports overload resolution ambiguity errors (#KT-31670,
#KT-31758), which is correct from its point of view. However, this is
a breaking change and to really make it, we should be very confident
and have enough motivation for it, therefore, we don't change behavior
now in order to collect more examples (if there are any). And if we
find a lot of erroneous examples, we'll be able to change the behavior
quite simply
Expression will be checked against expected type later.
Theoretically, this is not very good, but it aligns with the old
inference, plus it helps avoiding multiple type mismatch diagnostics.
Nikolay Lunyak