Creating a new array (and copying data into it with System.arraycopy)
doesn't work in generic case, because the actual array class depends on
call site.
1. consider reads of fields from the same file "stable" just like
functions, i.e. assume their nullability information is correct
2. apply if-null fusion repeatedly until the subject is no longer a
nested if-null expression
Otherwise extension methods named toString/equals/hashCode were
generated incorrectly on JVM IR, which could result in
AbstractMethodError at runtime.
#KT-45963 Fixed
Coroutine transform would occasionally *extend* the range of a
local instead of shrinking it (if the next suspension point
is after the end point for the local). That leads to the local
variable table having a local that covers code where it is not
defined. That is invalid and leads to D8 removing the locals
table from the code.
Commonize (in terms of TypeSystemCommonBackendContext implementations
for KotlinType/IrType) code that computes optimal TypeMappingMode to
apply to different positions where inline class types can be present.
As shown in KT-44412 (or KT-45319 or KT-17728):
```
fun test5() {
var i = 0
Outer@while (true) {
++i
var j = 0
Inner@do {
++j
} while (if (j >= 3) false else break) // break@Inner
if (i == 3) break
}
}
```
To properly set the loop target for `break` in do-while loop condition,
the loop target for that do-while loop should be ready before parsing
the loop condition.
Previously, Raw FIR loop building configures loop target after visiting
loop conditions. This commit splits the configuration and lets the
builders prepare the loop target for do-while loop only.
This reverts commit 9934cfbb00.
See the tests added: Subclass may have private same-name method that
should not be a reason to avoid generating fake overrides
Protected functions on unrelated classes cannot be called from outside
the current package, so in general, we can only call the static proxy,
not the original companion method.
This has an ABI compatibility implication in that removing `@JvmStatic`
from a protected companion method will require recompiling Kotlin use
sites (of course, this is already source- and binary-incompatible from
Java perspective).
#KT-12063 Fixed
Denis.Zharkov