Given a singleton class 'S' with possibly uninitialized static instance
(enum entry, interface companion object).
Such singleton can be referenced by name, or as an explicit or implicit
'this'.
For a given singleton class 'S' we
either use 'this@S' from context (local or captured),
or 'S' as a static instance.
Local or captured 'this@S' should be used if:
- we are in the constructor for 'S',
and corresponding instance is initialized
by super or delegating constructor call;
- we are in any other member of 'S' or any of its inner classes.
Otherwise, a static instance should be used.
Note that current behaviour is made similar to the case with
properties initializers/accessors, which means that more complex
cases are not covered yet (see KT-20801) #KT-20802 fixed.
The reason is that before dc02b2e3ab and 8a0dcca957,
TypeConstructor.isFinal for some class descriptors
(DeserializedClassDescriptor, LazyJavaClassDescriptor,
MutableClassDescriptor) were implemented as `isFinalClass` (which is
`modality == FINAL && kind != ENUM_CLASS`), and all others as
`modality == FINAL` or simply true/false. This led to differences in
behavior depending on the exact instance of the class descriptor.
Now that TypeConstructor.isFinal is always `modality == FINAL`, some
tests (PseudoValueTestGenerated) fail because the finality of some type
constructors changed and these tests render final vs non-final type
constructors differently.
In this commit, TypeConstructor.isFinal is now made to behave safer,
i.e. considering enum class type constructor to be non-final (as was the
case earlier for some ClassDescriptor instances). Some diagnostics might
disappear (e.g. FINAL_UPPER_BOUND) but it doesn't look like a big deal
It might differ from the JVM package FQ name if the JvmPackageName
annotation is used. This will be useful for faster indexing in the IDE
and for reflection
Constant expressions are inlined if they do not depend on non-inlineable
vals.
Java constants are always inlined.
Kotlin constants are inlined in LV 1.1+.
Divide incompatibility on two groups: strong and weak. Strong incompatibility means that if declaration with such incompatibility has no `actual` modifier then it's considered as usual overload and we'll not report any error on it.
#KT-20540 Fixed
#KT-20680 Fixed
- Make AbstractDiagnosticsTest dump function contracts
- Add diagnostics tests on parsing contracts
- Add diagnostics tests on smartcats in presence of functions with
contracts
- Add diagnostics tests on initialization and flow in presence of
in-place called lambdas
==========
Introduction of EffectSystem: 16/18
- Add method "doTestWithStdLib" which launches test with stdlib
- Change GenerateTests.kt to generate cfg tests with stdlib from
folders 'cfgWithStdLib' and 'cfgVariablesWithStdLib'
==========
Introduction of Effect System: 14/18
- Add ContractDescriptorRenderer
- Add option to dump function contracts in DescriptorRendererOptions
- Add parsing of LANGUAGE_VERSION directive in AbstractLoadJava
- Add tests on serialization-deserializaton identity of contracts
==========
Introduction of EffectSystem: 13/18
This commit support the following case.
Suppose we have such declaration:
fun <T> foo(): T { ... }
Then in code we want to use it like this: `foo() as String`.
But in LV <= 1.1 we have type inference error: "Not enough
information for type parameter `T`". This error happened because we
do not use type from cast as expected type for call.
In this commit we fix this problem and use this type as expected type
in following cases:
- our function has only one type parameter (this can be relaxed later)
- function parameter types and extension receiver type not contains `T`
Also this fix problem with `findViewById`.
Already signature was: `fun findViewById(...): View`
and was used like: `findViewById() as MyView`.
New signature is `fun <T : View> findViewById(...): T`
and old usage was broken because of problem described above
Codegen generates static backing fields for object properties.
They are initialized in class constructor but some of them are final static
and such access is prohibited in specification but it's allowed in
java bytecode <= 1.8. Such access in 1.9 bytecode cause
"IllegalAccessError: Update to static final field Object.INSTANCE
attempted from a different method (<init>) than the initializer method <clinit>"
Added additional hidden field in interface companion to pass out
companion instance from <clinit>.
#KT-15894 Fixed
Alexey Andreev