If kapt is enabled, there are several Kotlin compilation tasks for one source set (stub generator + compile). We should attach the expect sources to all of them.
This also fixes KT-29302 where stub generation is skipped while the
subsequent annotation processing phase anticipates the generated stubs.
This patch addresses cases where kapt.use.worker.api=true. The cases
where kapt.use.worker.api=false are handled in the same place of stub
generation.
The root problem is the fact that ConstantExpressionEvaluator returns
null for values such as infinity and NaN loaded from cls psi (see
IDEA-207252). This commit simply reverts a part of 8ab9226805 where we
started to compute default values more often than needed. In
LazyJavaClassMemberScope, we only need to check whether or not there
_is_ a default value, not compute its value.
#KT-29792 Fixed
This code can be invoked early, during body resolution and before the
fact that a property has backing field (which is only known for certain
after body resolution, because an implicit 'field' identifier may be
used). Since split annotations are cached until the end of the program,
they may end up on incorrect elements in the bytecode (or disappear
completely) as in KT-29507 or KT-28182.
Because the FIELD target has the lowest priority among implicit
annotation targets (see TARGET_PRIORITIES), it's safe to always assume
that FIELD is a valid target when splitting annotations. This only
changes the way annotations are split in case of incorrect code, as
changes in test data show.
#KT-28182 Fixed
#KT-29507 Fixed
^KT-29893 Fixed
Provide AsyncScriptDefinitionsContributor.
Show a notification if the highlighting for script is requested when not all script templates are loaded
In constructs such as 'd[i] += x', where both indexed get and indexed
set are dynamic calls, it's safe to generate augmented assignment body
directly, without temporary variables for array ('d') and index ('i').
Note that corresponding IntermediateValue's are OnceExpressionValue's,
which would throw an exception if this assumption is violated.
NB1 Not every dynamic unary or binary expression is translated to
dynamic operator expressions literally. For example, assignments and
increments can have safe calls in LHS, which require some extra logic.
NB2 There are some open design questions left regarding how dynamic
expressions should actually be translated.
Yan Zhulanow