Avoid name clashes in cases such as
inline class Login(val login: String)
inline class Password(val password: String)
fun validate(login: Login) { ... }
fun validate(password: Password) { ... }
The design is to use `suspend fun` instead of coercion, just as suspend
lambdas.
However, this syntax is not supported in the parser. But this is not a
problem, since the coercion lead to internal compiler error.
As a workaround everybody uses suspend lambdas.
#KT-24860: Fixed
- Calling suspend functions is allowed
- Presence of suspend function type still makes declaration
unusable unless it belongs to a value parameter as a top-level type
containing less then three parameters
Still, warning should be emitted because they will become unsupported in 1.4
#KT-25683 In Progress
It is safe to treat DefaultValueArgument as UNKNOWN_COMPUTATION, because
default arguments can't break smartcasts.
Possibly, they can add new ones, but it can be supported later.
^KT-25278 Fixed
The order of types enumeration has been changed recently:
previously it was collected at first from a child and then from
its parent, but now it's being collected in order of appearance
`CONFLICTING_JVM_DECLARATIONS` diagnostics are reported because we're
trying to generate functions from `Any` once for inline class and
once for data class
#KT-25760 Fixed
Previously, enum entries were treated by the data-flow subsystem similar
to other class/singletons. As a consequence, calls like
'Enum.ENTRY.property' had IdentifierInfo of 'property'.
However, specially for enum entries, descriptor of 'property' is one and
the same for all entries. It means that from the data-flow point of
view, 'Enum.ONE.property' and 'Enum.TWO.property' are *one and the same
data-flow values*.
It could obviously lead to some bogus smartcasts, so this commit
introduces separate IdentifierInfo.EnumEntry and uses it to build proper
qualified values.
^KT-20772 Fixed
The source of testdata change is following commit from the
intellij-community repo:
d2bfe3d14bfa48af585f1faddc9a0c37dc05e724
It changes how Java-resolution resolves constructors:
- before, *any* PsiMethod without type reference was treated as
constructor
- now, PsiMethod without type reference is treated as constructor
only if their *names also match*
In particular, in this test, 'void () {}', surprisingly, doesn't have a
type reference ('void' is parsed as PsiErrorElement:Identifier
expected), its name is '<unnamed>', and its visibility is
'package-private' (!)
Therefore, previously we thought that 'Nameless' has package-private
constructor and were reporting INVISIBLE_MEMBER.
Now we don't see any constructor so we add default constructor, which has
public-visibility -> error is gone.
Note that this change affects behavior only when "red" code is already
present in the project (for "green" code, assumption "method without type
reference is a constructor" is indeed correct).
Before this commit, expect super-class without constructors did not
provoke SUPERTYPE_NOT_INITIALIZED. However, it should, but only
if sub-type is normal class (not an expect one).
So #KT-24597 Fixed
Dmitry Savvinov