Commit Graph

27 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
victor.petukhov 30762a450a Wrap diagnostic parameters to double quotes and split by comma instead of semicolon 2019-02-14 12:31:42 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov 9129210cfe Move changes from dfb379d under new language feature (#KT-28672)
Changes from that commit are breaking, and should be pass throw LC
2019-02-07 12:12:34 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov 0501a108c0 Fix tests in DiagnosticsTestWithStdLibGenerated with NI 2019-02-01 11:40:20 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov dfb379d999 Expand Effect System with receiver values (#KT-28672)
Add some classes to hierarchy of `ESValue`:
- `ESReceiver` -- representation of receiver
  of lambda function
- `ESDataFlow` and `ESDataFlowReceiver` -- little refactoring of entities
  that holds information for DFA (description in comments in code).

Also add kdoc to classes of `ESValue` hierarchy
2019-01-31 17:25:13 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov 932e0234e7 Add testdata for issue #KT-28672 2019-01-31 17:25:13 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov e483f83666 Make 'is'-operator more stupid
Consider following expression: 'call() is Foo'. Suppose that we know
something about the 'call()', e.g. 'returns(foo) -> <condition>'

Previously, we've tried to re-use knowledge about 'call()', constructing
some smart clause, like 'returns(true) -> foo is Foo && <condition>'.

The conceptual error here is that *we can't* argue that <condition>
holds. Imagine that 'call()' actually has unspecified 'returns(foo2) ->
<!condition>', and 'foo2 is Foo' also holds. Then we would get
'returns(true) -> foo2 is Foo && <condition>' <=> 'returns(true) ->
<condition>' for the whole call, which is not correct.

More concrete example would be something like:
'if (!x.isNullOrEmpty() is Boolean)'

^KT-27241 Fixed
2019-01-17 12:47:27 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov 04ff2a3ee7 Add test on isNullOrEmpty-like contract
Currently, behavior is undesired, see KT-27241
2019-01-17 12:47:27 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov a4d1a8f60a Get rid of FUNCTOR slice, use lazy value in ContractDecription instead
Functor is an imperative representation of function's contract (contrary
to ContractDescription, which is a declarative one). ContractDescription
is convenient when we deal with sources of contracts declarations
(binaries, source), while Functors are convenient for analyzing code
with contracts.

It means that we have to convert ContractDescription into Functor when
we start working with contracts. This computation isn't trivial, and
Functor and ContractDescription are in 1-1 correspondence, so we would
like to cache Functor for each ContractDescription somewhere.

We used to do this in binding trace, in slice FUNCTOR.

Now, it turns out that this approach causes "Rewrite at slice"
exception, see KT-28847. We won't go into details of why that happens
here, you can see the issue comments for details (but be prepared for the
very long and nitty-gritty story)

This commit removes the problematic slice and introduces another
approach, where Functor is attached to the ContractDescription, computed
lazily and cached here.

^KT-28847 Fixed
2019-01-14 11:11:03 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov 594a6588f9 Add test on rewrite at slice FUNCTOR 2019-01-14 11:10:37 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov 8a0057b387 Introduce specific version of NO_RETURN_IN_FUNCTION_WITH_BLOCK_BODY for KT-28061
In 1.3.0 there was introduced KT-28061 bug, which caused some of the
NO_RETURN_IN_FUNCTION_WITH_BLOCK_BODY diagnostics to be lost (turning
"red" code into "green")

500dc11514 fixes the bug and returns
lost diagnostics back. This commit adds additional information for some
of the cases where diagnostics were list and then brought back (for the
user sanity).

The heuristic used for detecting cases which need additional information
is simple: if function has return in in-place called lambda, and
NO_RETURN_IN_FUNCTION_WITH_BLOCK_BODY should be reported, then we
enhance it with additional information.

^KT-28061 Fixed
2019-01-11 11:44:39 +03:00
Marcin Moskala 686cfa6fd2 Fix common misspellings 2018-12-21 16:13:42 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov 500dc11514 Fix missed returned expression if the last expression was condition jump
See ticket comments for the detailed description

^KT-28061 Fixed
2018-12-10 13:38:43 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov c9e87bf353 Add test on in-place lambda with return + safecall
Currently, diagnostics behavior is undesired. The next commit fixes it

^KT-28061 In Progress
2018-12-10 13:38:43 +03:00
Mikhail Zarechenskiy bae3ff5211 Don't try parsing contract-like function not from kotlin package
Returning `null` from `doCheckContract` functions means that we
have failed to parse contract function and should report an error, but
if the called function isn't true contract, we shouldn't evaluate that code
at all.

 #KT-27758 Fixed
2018-10-24 12:03:04 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov 051ad0f79e Fix unsound smartcast due to returns(null) in safecall
^KT-26382 Fixed
2018-09-05 16:27:48 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov 18338f4ea3 Add test on safecall of function with returns(null) contract
Currently with non-desired testdata, fix incoming in the next commit.
2018-09-05 16:27:47 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov 2179ae496e Fix testdata after improvements in contract parsing diagnostics 2018-08-30 16:20:36 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov a6783176ea Add tests on illegal usages of Contracts DSL
(currently with undesired behavior, it will be fixed in the next
commits)
2018-08-30 16:20:04 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov ee8702d21e Load of testdata change due to contracts publishing
See changes in e2606b72bdbec2fea567d4127197707869eb801e
2018-08-30 16:19:55 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov 57bafcf9e9 Do not lose information about contracts if call uses default value
It is safe to treat DefaultValueArgument as UNKNOWN_COMPUTATION, because
default arguments can't break smartcasts.

Possibly, they can add new ones, but it can be supported later.

^KT-25278 Fixed
2018-08-10 13:19:32 +03:00
Denis Zharkov 375f3c0769 Fix type-intersection-related test data
The order of types enumeration has been changed recently:
previously it was collected at first from a child and then from
its parent, but now it's being collected in order of appearance
2018-08-10 15:40:50 +07:00
Dmitry Savvinov a8e1a6a2a1 Add contract for 'synchronized'
^KT-25962 Fixed
2018-08-08 12:53:09 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov a81fc9e9bc Add contract to checkNotNull overload without message
^KT-25303 Fixed
2018-08-08 12:50:38 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov b29a6e48fb Refactor language features, which control effect system
- Introduce new language feature 'ReadDeserializedContracts', which
allows to deserialize contracts from metadata.

- Introduce new language feature 'AllowContractsForCustomFunctions',
which allows reading contracts from sources.

- Use new features instead of combination 'CallsInPlaceEffect ||
ReturnsEffect'

- Rename 'CallsInPlaceEffect' -> 'UseCallsInPlaceEffect',
'ReturnsEffect' -> 'UseReturnsEffect'. As names suggest, they control
if it is allowed to use corresponding effect in analysis.

We have to introduce separate 'ReadDeserializedContracts' to enable
contracts only in some modules of the project, because libraries are
read with project-wide settings (see KT-20692).
2018-01-26 11:30:44 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov 816d89e393 [NI] Improved testdata after changes in applicabilities
This commits introduces testdata changes, where NI behaviour strictly
improved, after several previous fixes.

For some tests, just WITH_NEW_INFERENCE directive was added. It
indicates, that some of previous commits first introduced error in that
test, and then some other commit fixed it (netting no overall testdata
change). It is preferrably to keep those annotations until we will
migrate to NI completely, to prevent unexpected regressions.
2017-12-07 12:49:56 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov d4d7946e6a Effects: add diagnostic tests on functions from stdlib
==========
Introduction of EffectSystem: 18/18
2017-10-12 11:55:26 +03:00
Dmitry Savvinov 4434db4d69 Effects: add diagnostic tests on contracts
- Make AbstractDiagnosticsTest dump function contracts
- Add diagnostics tests on parsing contracts
- Add diagnostics tests on smartcats in presence of functions with
contracts
- Add diagnostics tests on initialization and flow in presence of
in-place called lambdas

==========
Introduction of EffectSystem: 16/18
2017-10-12 11:55:26 +03:00