As of Kotlin 1.0 and 1.1, expression 'a in x .. y' is considered
equivalent to 'x.rangeTo(y).a', and should be evaluated in the following
order:
1. x
2. y
3. a
4. compare x with a
5. compare y with a (if needed)
It's safe to upcast integer types to Long,
floating-point types to Double.
So we don't have to create a range instance for cases such as
fun testLongInInt(x: Long, a: Int, b: Int) =
x in a .. b
which is equivalent to
fun testLongInInt(x: Long, a: Int, b: Int) =
x in a.toLong() .. b.toLong()
DUP_X1; POP = SWAP
p1_a; p1_b; SWAP = p1_b; p1_a
where p1_a, p1_b are instructions without side effects pushing value of
size 1 on stack.
E.g.: ACONST_NULL; ALOAD 0; SWAP = ALOAD 0; ACONST_NULL
NOP; NOP = NOP
Provide BoundedValue-based implementation of InExpressionGenerator,
test it on range of comparable values.
Drop unneeded test (range of comparables is already tested by
ranges/contains/inComparableRanges.kt).
There's a subtle difference in behavior between comparing
primitive Float/Double (comparison follows IEEE standard)
and boxed Float/Double (comparison is a total order).
Make sure this corner case is preserved.
No package annotations are going to be loaded, and
TypeQualifierDefault/TypeQualifierNickname are no longer recognized by
default. Use the CLI argument "-Xload-jsr305-annotations" to enable this
behavior back
#KT-10942
Ensure that messages reported on a file but with no line information are
reported before diagnostics related to code. This fixes
Java9ModulesIntegrationTest.testSeveralModulesWithTheSameName on some
machines
It was only used for type-related nullability/mutability
annotations and it was necessary to remove them
in the descriptor renderer (duplicating their fqnames there).
At the same time they're only needed for types enhancement
where they can be simply restored from type owners' descriptors
The testData changes are more or less correct: this kind of annotations
is bound both to types themselves and their use because of their targets
As the type is anyway replaced with not-nullable version
explicitly, the only thing that changes is what type is loaded
for String[][].class:
- before it would be Array<Array<String?>?>
- now it's Array<(out) Array<(out) String!>!>
It's both a minor change and new behaviour can be considered
as correct
If a path to the module-info.java file is passed as an argument, we
should treat all other source files passed as arguments (either as
individual source files or inside a source directory) as members of that
module. Previously we treated other source files as members of the
unnamed module, and this resulted in incorrect errors when using a
member exported with a qualification from another named module, for
example
#KT-18598 In Fixed
To compute modules to be added to compilation roots in
JavaModuleGraph.getAllDependencies, we should look not only for
transitive requirements of root modules, but for transitive requirements
of _root modules' requirements_. The same logic applies to
JavaModuleGraph.reads. In other words, when looking for a path in the
module graph between two modules, the first edge's transitiveness
doesn't matter, but all other edges after the first must be transitive.
There was also a stupid bug in dfs in
JavaModuleGraph.getAllDependencies: we continued the DFS only if the
module _was not_ added to the "visited" set ("add" returns true if the
element was added successfully)
#KT-18598 In Progress
Note that javac reports a nice error in this case ("package foo is
declared in module lib, which is not in the module graph"), but we only
report "unresolved reference" because the corresponding modules are not
added to classpath roots. We should improve this in the future
#KT-18598 In Progress
Files like ant-javafx.jar, deploy.jar, java.jnlp.jar, javafx-swt.jar etc
should not be added to the classpath if JDK home points to a JDK 9
distribution
Dmitry Petrov