In case Java enum has an abstract member, it has the ACC_ABSTRACT flag
set in the bytecode. However, we should still load it with final
modality to be consistent with Kotlin enums which are always considered
final
#KT-23426 Fixed
Since we skipped trivial constraint with `Any?` from parameter type of
function `equals`, the compiler thought that there is no proper
constraints (upper bounds do not matter here) and marked resolved
call as a failed one, then diagnostic about missing equals was added
Also, tune `TrivialConstraintTypeInferenceOracle` for `Any?`-like
constraints
#KT-30724 Fixed
These tests were added for suspend-conversions, it worked only
with new inference, but implementation was incorrect and had other
bugs, which were fixed in 1ac25259.
Support of suspend-conversions will be addressed later with a different
implementation (#KT-30703)
For functions with implicit return type annotations will be replaced
anyway in order to initialize return type, so this restriction in
`StubType` was too strong
#KT-30656 Fixed
Add `IntegerLiteralTypeConstructor` that holds types, that can take
integer literal with given value. It has two supertypes
(`Number` and `Comparable<IntegerLiteralType>`) and have
special rules for subtyping, `intersect` and `commonSuperType`
functions with primitive number:
Example (assuming that ILT holds Int type):
* ILT <: Int
* Int :> ILT
* ILT intersect Int = Int
* commonSuperType(ILT, Int) = Int
#KT-30293 Fixed
#KT-30446 Fixed
The problem is that delegated properties resolve two calls together:
`getValue`/`setValue` with a common receiver, which can contain
callable references. For each completion new anonymous descriptor
was created and caused "rewrite at slice" exceptions later.
Now there is a little hack to check that during one inference session
we don't complete one call more than one time.
More correct fix would be to explicitly specify common receiver for
inference session but it requires quite big refactoring, which will
be done later with a whole refactoring of the common solver
#KT-30250 Fixed
Consider common supertype of `S` and `Nothing`, where `S` has nullable
upper bound or it's flexible. Before the fix, result was `S?`, which
is correct but too conservative. Now, we'll preserve nullability of
resulting type if it's already nullable.
This happened because we were failing to find path of not-nullable
types from `Nothing` to `S`, which should obviously exists by
semantics of Nothing
Alexander Udalov