Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mikhael Bogdanov 02d9c526e2 Proper resort variables on inlining lowered ir closures
Original problem is that lowered ir closures doesn't meet inliner expectations
 about captured variable position in inlining method.
 E.g.: Call 'foo(valueParam) { capturedParam }' to
  inline function 'foo' with declaration

      inline fun foo(valueParam: Foo, inlineParamWithCaptured: Bar.() ->) ....

 is reorganized through inlining to equivalent call foo(valueParam, capturedParam1, cp2 ...).
 But lowered closure for lambda parameter has totally different parameters order:

     fun loweredLambda$x(extensionReceiver, captured1, cp2..., valueParam1, vp2...)

 So before inlining lowered closure should be transformed to

     fun loweredLambda$x(extensionReceiver, valueParam1, vp2..., captured1, cp2..)

 #KT-28547 Fixed
2019-01-03 07:57:36 +01:00
Svyatoslav Kuzmich 392ad521fd [JS IR BE] Reflection support 2018-08-15 13:35:14 +03:00
Mikhael Bogdanov e149cbe852 Mute failed jvm ir tests 2018-06-28 12:26:41 +02:00
Anton Bannykh 96355e2732 JS IR: mute codegen box tests automatically 2018-06-09 19:15:38 +03:00
Alexander Udalov 06a67e6602 Merge boxWithStdlib testData into box, delete BoxWithStdlib test 2016-03-09 10:25:38 +03:00