- If too few or too many type arguments were provided, they were all
thrown away in `TypeArgumentMapping`,
`FirCallCompletionResultsWriterTransformer`, and `KtFirCallResolver`.
The fix handles type arguments of the wrong arity more gracefully.
- Note for `TypeArgumentMapping`: Excess type arguments are not needed
for candidate resolution. Excess type arguments are still resolved
due to the handling in `FirCallCompletionResultsWriterTransformer`.
- Post-processing in `AllCandidatesResolver`: When all candidates are
resolved in `AllCandidatesResolver.getAllCandidates`, the function
builds a FIR file. During that resolution, the
`generic<String, String>` call (in example
`functionCallWithTooFewTypeArguments.kt`) is correctly marked as
inapplicable, but the missing type argument is inferred as an error
type. `firFile` then contains a function call
`generic<String, String, ERROR>` instead of `generic<String, String>`.
This call is still marked as inapplicable. Despite that, the
*subsequent* resolution by
`bodyResolveComponents.callResolve.collectAllCandidates` disregards
the call's inapplicability and resolves successfully into an
applicable candidate. This is because `CandidateFactory` doesn't make
any guarantees for already inapplicable calls. The fix adds
post-processing to `AllCandidatesResolver` to preserve candidate
inapplicability.
- Most tests that this commit changes had slightly different results due
to type arguments becoming resolvable.
- `wrongNumberOfTypeArguments.kt` and
`wrongNumberOfArgumentsInTypeAliasConstructor.kt`:
`ConeDiagnostic.toFirDiagnostics` prefers specific errors. Because
`ARGUMENT_TYPE_MISMATCH` is specific and `INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE` is
not, only the former is reported. I see no reason to pass an illegally
typed argument in either test, so the change reduces the errors to
`INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE`.
- `typeAliasSamAdapterConstructors2.fir.kt`: See KT-55007.
- Disable `mismatchTypeParameters` JS backend test due to its handling
of excess type arguments. See KT-55250.
^KT-54980 fixed
ensure fir annotations are included in FirDanglingModifierList and resolved,
dedicated DanglingTopLevelModifierListStructureElement exists for top
level lists only, class level lists are processed by containing structure
element
k1 would suggest `get` as well
but with current fir structure with fake desugaring
get is moved to the separate fake psi which doesn't exist
thus the problem is ignored for now
^ KTIJ-24025
In K1 analogue of `K2_VISIBILITY_ERROR` is `K1_RUNTIME_ERROR`, so
candidates with `K2_VISIBILITY_ERROR` should win over innaplicable
candidates with `INAPPLICABLE`, `INAPPLICABLE_ARGUMENTS_MAPPING_ERROR`
or `INAPPLICABLE_WRONG_RECEIVER` applicability
This is needed to allow resolution to invisible symbols (and later
suppress error with `@Suppress("INVISIBLE_SYMBOL", "INVISIBLE_REFERENCE")`
^KT-55026 Fixed
^KT-55234
- `context(...)` is a modifier that must precede annotations and other
modifiers, so for declarations it is rendered in
`renderAnnotationsAndModifiers`.
- Ignore `@ContextFunctionTypeParams` in the annotation list of FE10
types, as the annotation is an implementation detail of context
receivers in K1 and shouldn't be rendered.
^KT-55098 fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/7652
Put this change into a separate commit because:
1. The change is boring and clutters the diff of the first commit
2. The first commits is already too big
^KTIJ-23669
FirErrorFunctions are created for unknown labels
when the code in return statements is not complete yet.
Such labels cannot be resolved, and no symbols should be created for them
^KTIJ-23421
hide explicit builtins to reveal target platform dependencies.
Otherwise, `expect` class from builtin of e.g. JDK
would be found instead of actual dependency from Kotlin Runtime
- The Java functions aren't recognized as candidates during the test
(`FULL_JDK` isn't helping), so I've replicated the tests with local
extension functions and confirmed that they uncover the same
exception.
For the following example:
```
fun foo(bar: Int) {
<expr>if (bar == 4) return "Four"
else return "Int"</expr>
}
```
AA FE1.0 `isUsedAsExpression` returns `false`.
Since the current AA FIR `isUsedAsExpression` returns `true` for the
above example, this commit fixes it.
- `toResolvedCallableSymbol`: cast defensively because
the resolved symbol might not be a callable symbol.
- `toKtCallInfo`: Check that the resolved symbol is actually callable.
^KTIJ-23003 fixed
Marco Pennekamp