Show what kind of declarations exactly are clashing: functions,
properties, or fields.
This is so that diagnostics about clashing properties and fields are
distinguishable from one another, since properties and fields
are rendered the same way in those diagnostics:
The issue was that when rendering declarations in
the `CONFLICTING_KLIB_SIGNATURES_DATA` diagnostics, we sort them using
`MemberComparator`. That comparator falls back to comparing
declarations' renders if all previous checks were unsuccessful
(and in case of almost identical properties they are). The renderer that
the comparator uses also renders the properties' backing field
annotations, for which it calls `PropertyDescriptor#getBackingField`.
That method wasn't implemented in IR-based descriptors.
This is fixed by returning an instance of the new
`IrBasedBackingFieldDescriptor` class from that method.
^KT-65551 Fixed
Test infrastructure runs tests in parallel for the same target executor.
Device descriptor should be synchronously checked and set.
Also fix the Xcode version comparison.
Merge-request: KT-MR-14256
Merged-by: Pavel Punegov <Pavel.Punegov@jetbrains.com>
They are important for overridability rules, so can't be just ignored.
Some arguments are still different on different platforms, so
commonized version is a bit strange.
But the only important part is selector, which should be same on
all platforms.
^KT-57588
This commit will introduce the first processing queue
which will take care of properly ordering the 'to translate' symbols
as well as taking care of 'dependency' symbols (aka symbols
mentioned in signatures or as supertypes).
- There are several changes like properly translating
types as ObjCProtocolType instead of ObjCClassType (if origin was an interface)
- Type translation of generics defined on interfaces will also emit id type.
- Add initial nested classes collection to the queue
- Add extension function test, add tickets references
^KT-65237 Verification Pending
^KT-65329 Verification Pending
There's an implicit contract in PCLA that the statement-level call
should be postponed iff it has something to be postponed inside.
And that contract didn't work well for string interpolation containing
some postponed calls.
Thus, we haven't run a completion results writing for them properly,
thus leaving type parameters (K from synthetic call) for expression
types instead of an inferred substituted type.
In this commit, the contract was reversed to explicitly enumerate
the cases when it's safe to resolve the candidate outside PCLA session.
See the comments at `mightBeAnalyzedAndCompletedIndependently`.
^KT-65341 Fixed
The problem arises when retrieveDirectOverriddenOf returns a
substitution override member. For such members, it is impossible to get
the first base member. For a correct result, it is required to find
originalForSubstitutionOverride for all substitutionOverrides.
#KT-64276 Fixed
For destructing calls, the component type is used for the property type
in all cases. However, this can result in runtime and/or compilation
errors when the property is a var and changed, especially when the
component is a primitive but the property type is nullable. Instead,
only use the component type when the property is also a val.
^KT-64944 Fixed
... if the delegate happens to be a function call whose second
argument is a callable reference but not actually a provideDelegate
call.
The fix is to ensure that the call is _actually_ a desugared
provideDelegate call.
This fixes a CCE in a case where the delegate expression is a regular
function call and the second argument is a callable reference.
#KT-65165 Fixed
If we encounter a declaration in the current module whose signature
is the same as that of a declaration in another module which we happen
to also reference from the current module, don't report any errors,
just like we don't do it in Kotlin/JVM. This leaves the user in the KLIB
hell situation, but this is intentional, because otherwise a legitimate
change like moving a declaration to another module and marking
the original one as `@Deprecated("", level = DeprecationLevel.HIDDEN)`
would lead to a error, and we don't want that.
Also, don't try to show the diagnostics on a declaration that doesn't
have an IrFile.
^KT-65063 Fixed
Sergej Jaskiewicz