Previously, creating a declaration with Fir2IrCallableDeclarationsGenerator/
Fir2IrClassifiersGenerator didn't guarantee that this declaration will
be actually added to the list of parent class/file declarations, which
lead to situations when FIR2IR created some declarations in the air
(mostly fake-overrides)
For reasoning refer to the message of the previous commit
It is the same as for `getIrFunctionSymbol`
There is one failing test here, caused by KT-61941
The issue was here before this commit, but it was hidden
The enumEntriesIntrinsicMultipleEnums.kt test was supposed to check that
JVM backend generates 3 `$EntriesIntrinsicMappings` classes: for X, for
Y, and for Z. Mappings classes are generated for enums without
`entries`, i.e. Kotlin enums compiled without `EnumEntries` language
feature, and Java enums. The test incorrectly _enabled_ the language
feature for X though, and `$EntriesIntrinsicMappings` for X was
generated anyway because of KT-61208.
To keep the original intention of the test, I'm disabling the language
feature for X, so that it will be considered as enum without `entries`.
KT-61208 will be fixed in a separate commit (with separate tests).
The boxInline and bytecodeText tests changed their meaning when language
feature EnumEntries started to be enabled by default, so those changes
are a continuation to ebd43fc8c0. The behavior did not change after
enabling the feature, once again because of KT-61208.
Also, remove obsolete error suppressions which are no longer needed
after 64c8ce18a0.
It's effectively a breaking change (^KT-62558)
K2 assigns flexible type to all static fields (from Java) and, for example,
`String? becomes String unlike K1. It affects IR signature generating.
That's why signature dump is disabled for some tests.
^KT-57811 Fixed
^KT-61786 Fixed
In Kotlin subclasses of `MutableCollection<Int>`, the method
`remove(Int)` has its argument boxed, so that it wouldn't clash with the
method from `java.util.List`. So `JavaOverrideChecker` should understand
that a Java method `boolean remove(java.lang.Integer)` overrides it,
otherwise platform declaration clash was reported.
The code is adapted from `forceSingleValueParameterBoxing` in K1's
`methodSignatureMapping.kt`.
The test has been moved and adapted from diagnostic to codegen box
tests, to check correct backend execution + runtime.
#KT-62316 Fixed
Removing nullability directives from the methods of anonymous classes
affects some bytecode listing tests, but the changes will take effect
only after the advancing of the bootstrap compiler version.
See ^KT-62044
These two tests are now failing with IR fake override builder because
e.g. the fake override `MyMutableList.foo` has two overridden symbols:
`MyList.foo` and `MyMutableCollection.foo`, as opposed to the normal K2
mode which only has the former.
This seems to only affect the printed IR dump. Note that in K1 there
were two overridden symbols as well.
^KT-57858 Fixed
Remove FirEmptyOverridesBackwardCompatibilityHelper since it's not used anymore
Remove overridesMemberWithPlatformDependent.kt test file since it becomes redundant
This is needed because in order to figure out which declarations are
visible from anonymous objects in terms of overridability (see
`FirVisibilityChecker.isVisibleForOverriding`), we need to get the
package name of that anonymous object, because there's package-private
visibility on JVM.
#KT-62017 Fixed
`FakeOverrideBuilder.provideFakeOverrides` recursively changes overrides
for all superclasses in the hierarchy, including lazy IR, which is a lot
of extra work.
Also it leads to some tests failing in the IR fake override builder mode
because it changes correct fake overrides of Java classes to incorrect
ones. Those tests are unmuted but it doesn't mean they are fixed -- most
likely we'll generate fake overrides via IR for lazy IR too, at which
point they'll start to fail again.
Fake overrides created by K1, as well as fir2ir in K2, use DEFINED. So
this gets rid of a lot of differences in IR text dumps between the K2
normal mode and K2 with IR fake overrides, and will ultimately help in
implementing and testing KT-61360.
The change in AddContinuationLowering is needed to fix tests like
kt47549. When creating anonymous classes for SAM implementations, we're
reusing the same fake override building machinery. And since we can't
extract any meaningful information from the fake override parameter's
origin anymore, we have to get the parameter from the original symbol.
Dmitriy Novozhilov