StubBasedBuiltInsSymbolProvider does not work for now for common modules (KT-61757)
but compiler builtins provider `FirBuiltinSymbolProvider` works.
Also, stub-based symbol providers should not be used in standalone mode.
Testdata from standalone is updated because of the difference
in property accessors (KT-62449) between stub and compiler builtin symbol providers.
Additionally, this commit fixes the behavior of `KotlinStaticPsiDeclarationFromBinaryModuleProvider`.
As compiler builtin declarations have no PSI attached,
`KotlinStaticPsiDeclarationFromBinaryModuleProvider` is used to get PSI
from `DecompiledPsiDeclarationProvider.findPsi`.
`DecompiledPsiDeclarationProvider` is only used in UAST standalone mode.
If you want to shorten call like `foo.bar()` into `bar()`, then you
need your range to intersect with `bar` callee reference. Having only
`foo` in the range is not enough
Same goes for the type references - to shorten `foo.Bar` into `Bar`, you
need at least some intersection of your range with `Bar` reference
^KTIJ-27139 Fixed
^KTIJ-27015 Fixed
if property doesn't specify explicit type,
property's return type would be calculated by provided initializer
^KT-62588 fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-12564
Merged-by: Anna Kozlova <Anna.Kozlova@jetbrains.com>
We should process generated property as a part of the primary constructor.
This was already implemented in 8387ea8a, but some parts were missed.
ClassDiagnosticRetriever:
* dropped relation to properties generated from constructor parameters
as they should belong to the primary constructor only
* accurate logic to fully visit an implicit primary constructor to be
able to process nested declarations (e.g., inside a super type call)
SingleNonLocalDeclarationDiagnosticRetriever:
* add relation to generated properties as now they fully belong to
the constructor
FileElementFactory:
* dropped explicit resolution of generated properties from a constructor
* added explicit resolution of generated enum members for consistency.
Effectively, this is not required because we don't have compiler
checkers for such generated enum member declarations
ClassDeclarationStructureElement:
* do not collect mapping for generated properties from constructor
* explicitly declare that we should process only ClassDelegationField
^KT-62437 Fixed
- Java combined declared member scopes are implemented as a composition
of the non-static and static scope, so we have to exclude inner
classes from the non-static scope to avoid duplicates.
- This is not an issue for Kotlin combined declared member scopes,
because the combined scope is already the base scope.
^KT-61800
- The semantics of a non-static declared member scope should be as
follows: For a variable `c: C` of class type `C`, the declared member
scope should contain all members `x` accessible as `c.x` (visibility
notwithstanding) which are *also* explicitly declared in `C`.
- Classifiers are not accessible as properties of a variable `c`, only
as static members of the class `C` itself, so non-static declared
member scopes should not contain any classifiers.
^KT-61800
- Now that combined declared member scopes for Java classes contain
static callables, we don't need to search symbols in the static member
scope. (Note that the static member scope is too broad for this use
case, as it contains symbols from superclasses, but we only need to
look at declared members because the correct `containingClass` is
already chosen.)
^KT-61901
^KTIJ-25126
it's useful for IDE's features such as write UAST or refactorings
^KT-62302 fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-12414
Merged-by: Anna Kozlova <Anna.Kozlova@jetbrains.com>
Before, `KtCodeFragment`/`FirCodeFragment` was analyzed as a part of
its context `KtModule`. This has the following complications:
- In non-source sessions, diagnostic reporting is globally disabled.
For code fragments, however, checking the code before passing it to
the backend is essential.
- Special treatment for call ambiguities in libraries
(`LLLibraryScopeAwareCallConflictResolverFactory`) becomes complicated
as the conflict resolver has to be applied to a library module.
- `KtCodeFragment`s usually have a shorter lifetime than their own
context. Caching may potentially be implemented differently for them.
^KT-61783 Fixed
This is needed because in order to figure out which declarations are
visible from anonymous objects in terms of overridability (see
`FirVisibilityChecker.isVisibleForOverriding`), we need to get the
package name of that anonymous object, because there's package-private
visibility on JVM.
#KT-62017 Fixed
Backend requires annotation constructors to be fully resolved for the
'IrConst' default value lowering. However, in the IDE there is usually
no need in complete annotation class resolution.
^KTIJ-27061 Fixed
Make `FirShorteningContext` correctly return symbols for type
parameters, so they are not ignored when scopes are inspected
Add additional type of `PartialOrderOfScope` - `TypeParameter`, because
otherwise it would have been classified as `Unclassified`, and that
breaks scopes comparison
Add missing type parameters to the scope of class header in
`ContextCollector`, add testdata for that
There is a bug in the compiler with type parameters leaking to nested
classes headers (KT-61959). After it's fixed, the testData with
incorrect expected shortenings/scopes should be adjusted and fixed too
^KTIJ-27050 Fixed
This should make reference shortener considerably faster, since it won't
need to perform redundant extra resolve of the file.
`ContextCollector` more accurately collects the scopes for the scripts,
so some script tests are also fixed.
It should fix the following bugs:
^KTIJ-26714 Fixed
^KTIJ-26727 Fixed
This is also an important part of fixing the following bugs:
- KTIJ-26715
- KTIJ-26734
But those bugs also rely on KT-61890, because completion uses scopes
and snows incorrect elements from them
FirDeclarationsResolveTransformer.transformSimpleFunction() performs
proper local function analysis only if the parent is properly set.
^KTIJ-26608 Fixed
- Previously, `KtFirAnonymousObjectSymbol` was a
`KtEnumEntryInitializerSymbol`, which carried the risk that an
anonymous object unrelated to enum entries might be used as an enum
entry initializer. This commit introduces a specific symbol for FIR
enum entry initializers.
- As a nice side effect, anonymous object symbol creation is simplified
and `KtFirEnumEntryInitializerSymbolPointer` can restore the symbol
via `KtFirEnumEntrySymbol.enumEntryInitializer`.
^KT-61425
- An enum entry's body is an initializer with members only accessible
within that body. Because users of the Analysis API might want to
analyze the members of the enum entry initializer, we expose this
initializer via `KtEnumEntrySymbol`. The initializer only exists if
the enum entry has a body.
- We already have some usages of the initializer inside symbol light
classes, which generate a light class for each enum entry, which
includes the enum entry's hidden members.
- To hide the implementation detail that initializers are anonymous
objects, `KtEnumEntryInitializerSymbol` is simply a
`KtSymbolWithMembers`.
- The advantage of making it a `KtSymbolWithMembers`, instead of
providing a custom way to get a member scope, is that we can pass
around the initializer easily, e.g. in `KtEnumEntrySymbolRenderer`.
- We implement `KtEnumEntryInitializerSymbol` directly as a
`KtFirAnonymousObjectSymbol` without a wrapper. This has a few
advantages:
1. We can directly benefit from the anonymous object symbol being a
`KtSymbolWithMembers`, so we don't have to handle enum entry
initializers specially in e.g. `KtFirScopeProvider`.
2. We don't have to implement a new symbol restoration mechanism for
the initializer.
3. This implementation matches the actual FIR tree structure (with a
simplification that the connecting anonymous object expression
between the enum entry and the initializing anonymous object is
omitted).
^KT-61425 fixed
- An enum entry is a variable which doesn't declare any additional
members. It must not be confused with its implementing anonymous
object initializer, which may declare additional members, but is an
implementation detail hidden outside the enum entry's initializer.
Hence, the enum entry variable should not have a (declared) member
scope.
- A following commit will add the ability to get the enum entry's
initializer, so that a member scope for this initializer can be
obtained (which might be relevant for local analysis).
^KT-61405 fixed
Ilya Kirillov