When synthetic member comes not from the receiver type itself,
but from one of its supertypes it doesn't make sense to subsitute
the member with receiver type, we should obtain relevant supertype
and use it instead.
#KT-16578 Fixed
When there is unsuccessful (e.g invisible) result of one kind (static/non-static)
and there is a successful candidate for another kind, choose the latter one.
Note, that we have to postpone commiting trace until we choose one of the results,
otherwise errors of unsuccessful results are reported
TODO: Maybe it makes sense to report all results when all of them are
unsuccessful (NONE_APPLICABLE or something like this)
#KT-16278 Fixed
In most of the cases it was used together with CLASS_ONLY and vice versa
They only case when CLASS_ONLY was used without INNER_CLASS
is possibleParentTargetMap.COMPANION_KEYWORD.
But after diagnostic NESTED_OBJECT_NOT_ALLOWED has been introduced,
there's no sense in the restriction of exactly the companion's parent
For clarification see test data changed
Usually, we have only CapturedType with such constructor.
We should prevent creation such types in the future (KT-16147).
Also added test for KT-14740 where this problem originally appears.
Do not report an error on enum entry without initializer if all parameters have default values
(error is still reported if there is no such constructor, or if the constructor call is ambiguous).
Record resolved call on KtEnumEntry.
NB is the enum entry has a corresponding subclass, we still have to generate the "default" constructor call,
because FE doesn't know about the platform-specific representation of that class and its constructors.
See also KT-14097, KT-15900
#KT-10711 Fixed
#KT-12802 Fixed
#KT-12964 Fixed
#KT-15439 Fixed
Analyze callable references in `dependent` mode, then complete them with
respect to expected types
Property with type inferred from getter could access primary constructor parameters inside the getter
(which is incorrect, and caused problems in compilation).
Fix scopes for property descriptor resolution.
'getScopeForMemberDeclarationResolution' in AbstractLazyMemberScope should always return member declaration resolution scope.
Two scopes are required, because both property initializer and property accessors should see property type parameters.
See doNotCaptureSupertype test for clarification:
When resolving b.collect(toList()) we're building a common system with
two variables T and R.
The problem was that when introducing the constraint
C<T, Inv<T>> <: C<in String, R> we then were seeing the constraint
T <= in String, and add the constaint T=Captured(in String)
That lead to R=Inv<T>=Inv<Captured(in String)>, and after approximation
R=Inv<in String>, that is not the desirable result (Inv<String> suits here)
But the root problem was that we add captured constaint when projection was from supertype,
that seems to be wrong, and for example Java doesn't do that in the similar situation.
#KT-11259 Fixed
Dmitry Petrov