This is needed to avoid problems with installation of proper jdk
on developer machines. Those tests will be moved back to main box
suites after migrating our tests on LTS versions of jdk (11 and 17
instead of 9 and 15)
Currently tags can be applied to all tests in specific testdata
directory by placing `_tags.txt` file in it, where all tags should
be listed on separate lines. Test generator adds those tags to
corresponding generated test classes with `@Tag` annotation
Please note that is applicable only to JUnit 5 tests
The main motivation for this change is that
java.lang.annotation.Repeatable has a parameter for the container
annotation, which is lost during conversion to
kotlin.annotation.Repeatable. To support j.l.a.Repeatable in backend
properly, it's absolutely necessary to be able to load the container
annotation for any repeatable annotation class, so the original
j.l.a.Repeatable needs to be stored in the descriptor and accessible
from the backend.
Instead of mapping j.l.a.Repeatable -> k.a.Repeatable, add a frontend
service PlatformAnnotationFeaturesSupport that will determine if an
annotation is repeatable "according to the platform rules", which for
JVM means that it's annotated with j.l.a.Repeatable.
Some effects of this change include:
- Usages of j.l.a.Repeatable are no longer reported as "deprecated", the
corresponding test is deleted
- Usages of repeatable annotations declared in Java with non-SOURCE
retention with LV 1.5 and earlier will now result in a slightly
different error (REPEATED_ANNOTATION instead of
NON_SOURCE_REPEATED_ANNOTATION)
#KT-12794
It's only enabled by default in FIR and might be turned on with a CLI flag
The main idea is that default FarFS re-read ZIP file list each time when
class file is requested that is quite slow.
We read it once and them reading bytes from the known offset.
Also, unlike the default version we don't perform attributes check on each access
On the one hand, it works faster on the other it might not notice that one
of the JAR has been changed during compilation process
But looks like it's not supposed to be a frequent even during
compilation of a single module
Since it's not feasible to support annotated types in 1.6, we're making
this an explicit error in 1.6, so that typeOf can become stable and this
feature can be supported in the future without breaking changes to the
existing code.
Note that extension function types are a special case of annotated
types. A separate error is created for them just because the message
"annotated types are not supported" would be confusing, since such types
don't have explicit annotations in the source code.
#KT-29919
Seperate checker for platforms that do not support this language feature yet
Synthetic implementations of annotations are generated on-demand with proper
equals, hashCode, and annotationType methods
#KT-47699 Fixed
Dmitriy Novozhilov