Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mikhail Glukhikh 8884cbe415 Introduce FIR_IDENTICAL for FIR vs old frontend tests #KT-36879 Fixed 2020-03-05 09:39:40 +03:00
Ilya Chernikov 6356807997 Reapply "Only create descriptors for candidates with lambda args"
#KT-36247 fixed
A lot of testdata changed because significanly less (error) descriptors
are created for unresolved types, so diagnostics became different.
2020-02-14 11:41:30 +01:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov 6735cc8937 [FIR] Implement new bound smartcast algorithm
#KT-36055 Fixed
2020-02-12 10:17:45 +03:00
Denis Zharkov 47ecaa5b06 FIR: Fix scope intersection types
Otherwise overload resolution ambiguity is reported in the test
2020-01-30 17:12:50 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov 2536fa0cd5 [FIR-TEST] Add new testdata generated after changes in previous commit 2019-12-12 16:11:46 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov 18f9272f56 [NI] Fix reporting smartcast diagnostics for intersection types
#KT-30826 Fixed
2019-04-12 17:36:59 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov a92cf19641 Revert "[NI] Fix reporting smartcast diagnostics for intersection types"
This reverts commit 033d7262

That commit breaks bootstraping
2019-04-11 18:49:02 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov 033d7262a2 [NI] Fix reporting smartcast diagnostics for intersection types
#KT-30826 Fixed
2019-04-11 18:10:59 +03:00
Mikhail Zarechenskiy 8757298994 Add diagnostics to test data from NI 2017-11-29 02:54:26 +03:00
Mikhail Zarechenskiy a71238bf94 Place !WITH_NEW_INFERENCE directive to diagnostics test data 2017-11-29 02:53:49 +03:00
Mikhail Zarechenskiy 7541a3754d Move SAM constructors to synthetic scope 2017-05-05 21:30:35 +03:00
Denis Zharkov 8df05c6c4c Refine 'isMoreSpecific' calculation
Choose member with better visibility, it's needed for proper calculation
of types intersection member scope

 #KT-10481 Fixed
2016-02-02 15:26:49 +03:00
Denis Zharkov b4bb92d136 Fix overload resolution ambiguity for types intersection
There are two different forms of types intestion:
1. Type parameters with multiple bounds
2. Smart casts

The problem was that when member scope of type intersection contained
effective duplicates and that lead to overload resolution ambiguity in
strange cases like `x.hashCode()`

For first type we do effectively the same thing as when building member
scope for class extending several interfaces: group all descriptors by
both-way-overridability relation and then choose most-specific in each
group.

For smart casts we do basically the same thing but with special
treatments:
1. From all descriptors that _equal_ to most specific we choose
   the one that works without smartcast if possible (i.e. we choose first from candidates list)
2. If smart-cast value seems to be unstable we use only member scope
   of receiver type + all descriptors from smart cast possible types
   that has incompatible signature. If we'd include all of them and
   choose one as more specific, and it would lead to false
   SMART_CAST_IMPOSIBLE (see test unstableSmartCast.kt)

 #KT-3996 Fixed
 #KT-10315 Fixed
2015-12-15 16:18:31 +03:00