Otherwise, the generated bytecode is unnecessarily suboptimal in some
(arguably weird) cases.
In the JVM backend, this was an accidental regression in #3260, as I had
not noticed that effectively inline-only functions were handled by a
separate branch in FunctionCodegen. In JVM_IR, I'm pretty sure the
redundant markers have always been there as `isSuspensionPoint` in
ExpressionCodegen never checked for effectively-inline-only-ness.
If an inline class is mapped to a reference type (or an array), it's Ok
to treat JVM view on a suspend function as returning a value of
corresponding inline class (although in reality it returns 'Any?'
because of COROUTINE_SUSPENDED).
See KT-36812. Aside from the problem stated there, D8 will throw out the
entire LVT if it sees a variable that has not been written to (and will
generate incorrect SSA if the slot is reused with a different type).
Note: this only fixes a FIR test because it's missing an `else -> throw`
branch, and default initialization satisfies the verifier and masks the
incorrect control flow.
This directory is skipped in JVM IR test generator, so they won't show
up as failed anymore.
Note that only failing tests are moved to oldLanguageVersions/. Tests
which already pass are still being run. It may be useful not to break
them in case we _do_ need to support some pre-1.3 language feature
switches in JVM IR.
This fixes Java interop of inline functions, which use coroutines.
However, we cannot transform the state-machine. Thus, we generate
a $$forInline counterpart for suspend functions (similar to inline
suspend functions) and invokeSuspend$$forInline for lambdas if these
coroutines are going to transformed (i.e. are declared inside inline
functions).
During transformation we just skip method with state-machine and
transform the $$forInline counterpart. Of course, if inline site is
inline itself, we generate both state-machine version (which will be
dropped during the next transformation) and $$forInline version.
Consequently, the final version of the coroutines will not have
$$forInline counterpart.
Unfortunately, since CompileKotlinAgainstInlineKotlin tests do not allow
java sources, the tests for the interop are usual box tests.
#KT-30707 Fixed
All bytecode text tests are run with stdlib in the classpath and only
for JVM backend, therefore directives WITH_RUNTIME, TARGET_BACKEND,
IGNORE_BACKEND are not needed
Use `// !LANGUAGE: -ReleaseCoroutines` instead in tests which require
old (1.2) coroutines, and nothing in tests which require new coroutines
because master is already 1.3. Also remove superfluous API_VERSION and
other directives which have no effect anymore. Do not include runtime
automatically with `WITH_COROUTINES`/`COMMON_COROUTINES_TEST` in box
tests; require `WITH_RUNTIME` for that (majority of tests already had it
anyway), but remove it from bytecode text tests where runtime is always
added automatically. Fix the coroutine package selection code in
KotlinTestUtils and update the bunch files correspondingly.
Disable tests in `box/coroutines/noStdLib` on JVM: despite the name,
these tests were launched with stdlib because of the code in
CodegenTestCase, and they do not work without it because at least
CoroutineUtil.kt requires stdlib to compile correctly
Sometimes, state-machine, generated in inline functions with
crossinline parameter, is transformed, since all usages should be
renamed.
However, this is wrong: in this case, we will have state-machine
inside state-machine.
This fix addresses the issue.
#KT-25893 Fixed
* The members of Result are isSuccess, isFailure, exceptionOrNull, getOrNull
* The rest of API is implemented via inline-only extensions
* There are two internal functions to hide detailed mechanics of an internal
Result.Failure class: createFailure and throwOnFailure
* Result.toString is explicit: either Success(v) or Failure(x)
See KT-26538
The changes are necessary because of release coroutines support:
- Get rid of suspendCoroutineOrReturn calls. It's anyway irrelevant
to what is being tested here
- In varValueConflictsWithTable.kt, variables slots have been shifted
because the variable for continuation's exception was removed
- In varValueConflictsWithTableSameSort.kt, a variable has been introduced
to preserve the same slot numbers for old variables.
Otherwise, they become shifted and to the second slot,
and there are a lot of irrelevant "ALOAD 2" instructions
This change is another example of why bytecode text tests are evil
Unlike ordinary lambdas, suspend lambdas do the computation in
doResume(Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Throwable;)Ljava/lang/Object;
method. As you can see, there are no decomposed parameters. As a result,
they used not to be generated.
To fix the issue, I add decomposed parameters to value parameters while
generating local variables table.
In addition, when generating suspend lambda for inline, the codegen
does not take this kind of parameters into account. This is also fixed.
#KT-18576: Fixed
Introduce COMMON_COROUTINES_TEST directive.
Every test with this directive is run twice: one time with
language version 1.2 and kotlin.coroutines.experimental package
and the other time with language version 1.3 and kotlin.coroutines
package. Each run is a separate method: with suffixes _1_2 and _1_3
respectively.
However, since codegen of release coroutines is not supported in JS
backend, we generate only one method: with suffix _1_2.
#KT-23362
In short, some of the bytecode analyzers assume that there could be
no stores instructions into parameter vars with value of different
types (even when the value type is a subtype)
See the issue for details
#KT-19713 Fixed
- Turn some const conditions into non-const conditions
- Make sure inlined const values are used where required
(otherwise they are eliminated by POP backward propagation)
Steven Schäfer