The main change here is addition of a check that NotNullBasicValue instances
are not being created for non-reference types
Exactly this change should be used instead of f25f0db10e
The latter commit lead to problem described in the KT-14242 issue:
v.getType().getSort() == w.getType().getSort() && (v.getType().getSort() != Type.OBJECT || v.equals(w))
Problem is that the condition above returns true without calling `v.equals(w)`,
because the sort of type is ARRAY, not OBJECT, so testArray was being treated
as NotNullable erroneously
So the second part of this change is effectively revering mentioned commit
#KT-14242 Fixed
Mikhail Glukhikh