When we generate call for 'foo', we make decision about invoking
a 'foo$default' too late, after the call arguments are generated.
If 'foo' was an override, and base class (interface) was generic,
'foo' in base class could have a different Kotlin and JVM
signature, so the arguments we generated could be generated wrong
(primitive or inline class values instead of boxes, see KT-38680).
Also, we always selected first base class in supertypes list,
which caused KT-15971.
Look into resolved call and see if we should actually call
'foo$default' instead of 'foo' when determining actual callable.
Overrides can't introduce default parameter values, and
override-equivalent inherited methods with default parameters
is an error in a child class. Thus, if we are calling a class
member function with a default parameters, there should be one
and only one overridden function that has default parameter values
and overrides nothing.
Before this commit we considered !isOverride as a sign that
function / field / accessor has no overridden symbols.
However, it's false for deserialized, because isOverride
is always false there.
This commit fixes 68 BB tests but breaks 25 BB tests (not yet muted)
Rely on the frontend weeding out cases that are not supported.
In psi2ir, introduce all the parameters before processing default
values.
Change the DefaultArgumentStubGenerator to generate code that
matches the behavior of the current backend.
Quoted from https://kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/classes.html
"On the JVM, if all of the parameters of the primary constructor have
default values, the compiler will generate an additional parameterless
constructor which will use the default values. This makes it easier to
use Kotlin with libraries such as Jackson or JPA that create class
instances through parameterless constructors."
The synthesized arguments caused the size of default value mask off by
one when it is close to the boundary of Int.SIZE, which in turn
resulted in wrong signature at call sites.
Original problem is that lowered ir closures doesn't meet inliner expectations
about captured variable position in inlining method.
E.g.: Call 'foo(valueParam) { capturedParam }' to
inline function 'foo' with declaration
inline fun foo(valueParam: Foo, inlineParamWithCaptured: Bar.() ->) ....
is reorganized through inlining to equivalent call foo(valueParam, capturedParam1, cp2 ...).
But lowered closure for lambda parameter has totally different parameters order:
fun loweredLambda$x(extensionReceiver, captured1, cp2..., valueParam1, vp2...)
So before inlining lowered closure should be transformed to
fun loweredLambda$x(extensionReceiver, valueParam1, vp2..., captured1, cp2..)
#KT-28547 Fixed
Jinseong Jeon