[IR] Remove unused MFVC getters
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy.Zhelenskiy <Evgeniy.Zhelenskiy@jetbrains.com>
#KT-1179
[IR] Add context receivers test, fix a flattening fields bug
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy.Zhelenskiy <Evgeniy.Zhelenskiy@jetbrains.com>
#KT-1179
[IR] Support `try` for MFVC
#KT-1179
[IR] Support `if` and `when` for MFVC, fix several bugs, refactor
#KT-1179
[IR] Rename MFVC tests + Add test for get-field optimization
#KT-1179
[IR] Suppress temporary test failing on Android
Bug is fixed in https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/6452
#KT-1179
[IR] Document the new MFVC lowering classes when necessary
#KT-1179
[IR] Correct work of the new MFVC lowering classes
#KT-1179
[IR] Prepare MFVC-lowering for the new MFVC classes
#KT-1179
[IR] Fix MFVC with type arguments/parameters
#KT-1179
[IR] Support MFVC with type parameters
#KT-1179
[IR] Integrate MFVC with Inline classes
#KT-1179
[IR] Fix compilation of MFVC in different module
#KT-1179
[IR] Add MFVC generation tests
#KT-1179
[IR] Implement equals call correct generation for MFVC
#KT-1179
[IR] Implement bridges generation for MFVC
#KT-1179
[IR] Implement MFVC basic flattening
#KT-1179
Merge-request: KT-MR-6213
Merged-by: Evgeniy Zhelenskiy <Evgeniy.Zhelenskiy@jetbrains.com>
E.g. when substituting T -> Array<T>, write the bytecode for the
Array<...> part for typeOf.
This fixes various issues where either Array nesting levels, nullability
information (for typeOf), or entire reification markers were missing,
causing incorrect outputs ranging from missing `?`s to missing `[]`s to
just reified types not really being reified.
^KT-53761 Fixed
When coroutine class is created, it's made child of SuspendFunction
class. Normally, SuspendFunction class can't be already lowered,
but if we are compiling stdlib it can happen. And if it is
bad fake overrides would be created before this commit.
Unfortunately, as problem can happen only during stdlib compilation,
no specific test can be added.
At first, I tried to modify the logic in PromisedValue.materializeAt
to get rid of all casts from Nothing? to other types, but that broke
a number of tests containing casts of java.lang.Void to other types,
so I decided to fix only this particular case with try...catch
(for some reason, here we get a null of type java.lang.Object).
JsIrLinker can't load nested declarations,
therefore it is required to load their parent.
This patch adds a dependency in the incremental cache graph
between nested declaration user and nested declaration parent.
^KT-53931 Fixed
^KT-54120 Fixed
If the super class is in a file that has already been lowered, the base
method has an extra continuation parameter which breaks things.
Also, SAM wrappers around functional objects are tail-call and do not
need continuations ever, so don't even try.
^KT-50950 Fixed
This is a proposal to fix KT-49364.
Operand stack type verification happens before `checkcast`
is executed. When we implicitly cast an inline class
to a non-inline type, if type of stack value is not subtype
of the target, then coercing is necessary.
It helps to:
- keep declarations even if they are not reachable and not exported
- not minify names of not exported declarations
Compiler argument: -Xir-keep=A,B
Can be used for top-level declarations or for member
^KT-54118 fixed
For non-suspend lambdas annotations are carried over to the
invoke method so that tooling can find the annotation there.
It seems reasonable that annotations are carried over to
the invokeSuspend method on suspend lambdas as well so that
similar tooling can be built and work for suspend lambdas.
Disable it if we do not have required `noCompiledSerializer` function in
runtime. Leave it enabled in tests.
Rollback some changes for old backend as it is unsupported now.
instead, plugins should emit the code similar to the TYPE_OF one with
a special call to MagicApiIntrinsics.voidMagicApiCall directly afterwards.
This is required because old compiler need to correctly inline code
rewritten by plugin.
Add intrinsic for kotlinx.serialization.serializer<T>() function.
Plugin intrinsic for old backend is removed because it is too hard
and unjustifiable to unify them.
#KT-53947 fixed
without the fix, in the presence of the implicit receiver of the same
type as the processed receive, the lowering was incorrectly substituting
the correct receiver with the accessor to the implicit one
Evgeniy.Zhelenskiy