Make parcelize work consistently with
`FirOverrideChecker`.
Actually, there is a philosophical question about
what to do when a plugin generates a class
in a new package, and this class is red code
(for instance, doesn't implement an abstract
member from a supertype). There's no source
to report such an error, but we probably do
want to run checkers to avoid trying to
compile red code to binaries (because it may
crash in backend, or it may silently work).
This commit introduces MppChecker kind, which represents the new property
of checkers
- `MppCheckerKind.Common` means that this checker should run from the same
session to which corresponding declaration belongs
- `MppCheckerKind.Platform` means that in case of MPP compilation this
checker should run with session of leaf platform module for sources
of all modules
An example of a platform checker is a checker that checks class scopes
and reports ABSTRACT_NOT_IMPLEMENTED and similar diagnostics. If some
regular class in the common module contains expect supertypes, the
checker should consider the actualization of those supertypes to get
a complete type scope
^KT-58881
This commit adds support for the Parcelize plugin to generate default
serialization implementation for the kotlin.time.Duration. As Parcelize
already supports serializing some of the kotlin library types it makes
sense to support more common ones for the user convenience.
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/264614661
Make sure redundancies between class and property TypeParceler
annotations are detected when a type alias is used. This requires
checking the expanded type arguments of the annotation, as just
comparing the cone types is not sufficient because the type arguments
are not expanded.
^KT-64979 Fixed
K2 checks that the entire Parceler of the WriteWith annotation is a
subtype of the expected Parceler for the property, while K1 only checks
that the type argument of the WriteWith Parceler is a subtype of the
property type. This mismatch leads to inconsistencies between K1 and K2
diagnostic reporting. Switch K2 to K1 behavior so diagnostics are
consistent.
^KT-60019 Fixed
Class properties are being expanded before checking for custom
parcelers, which makes custom parcelers of type alias unable to be
found. To maintain K1 behavior, the custom parceler type must also be
expanded, so even the aliased type is supported when used in its raw
form as a class property.
^KT-64707 Fixed
It's going to be deprecated in Gradle 8.3
There's currently no way to pass a `org.gradle.api.provider.Provider` to the JavaExec.systemProperty or Test.systemProperty. There's a workaround using `org.gradle.process.CommandLineArgumentProvider`, but I intentionally don't rework these calls as Gradle is going to allow passing providers to configure system properties: https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/12247#issuecomment-1568427242
^KTI-1473 In Progress
A previous fix to the generator made the generator and checker
validation of classes which could be parcelized different. The checker
would report error in cases where the generator would not generate
anything. Align these checks, with improved code sharing, so errors are
not reported on classes which will not have parcelize components
generated.
^KT-63086 Fixed
Adding these dependencies to the `api` configuration pollutes classpath for each dependant modules even if it doesn't need them. Instead, the dependencies should be declared more granularly if they're required
#KTI-1349 In Progress
The `kotlin-test` dependencies are left untouched as changing them affects publications, thus these versions are independent from the used inside our build
#KTI-1349 In Progress
Sometimes when running MPP tests we may
observe js-specific modules running with
the jvm-specific fir2ir converter
(probably because the name didn't contain
the JVM affix).
There's no way for the end user to use this implementation anymore,
since old JVM backend cannot be enabled, and nothing else from Kotlin
depends on it.
Now all tests with `Fir` in name are named accordingly to parser which
is used in them -- `FirPsi` or `FirLightTree`. This is needed to keep
consistency between different types of tests, because there is no
single default in parser mode between different scenarios of using FIR
This is needed to provide an ability to extend different kinds of
functional types
Also, cleanup and rename utilities related to functional types to avoid
possible confusions
Wojciech Litewka