^KT-63550 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/13094/timeline
Now it's required to create a new ScopeSession when searching for expect
members for actuals. If you keep reusing actualScopeSession then members
declared in platform may "slip into" the search results, resulting an
incorrect expect for actual (e.g. it happens in
supertypeIsExpectActual_covariantOverrideOfInjectedFromSuper_transitiveSubstitutionFakeOverride.fir.kt)
I suppose that it always has been a bug that we reused
actualScopeSession because we were mixing actualScopeSession and
expect FirSession (which is a bad idea), but we simply didn't have cases
where this bug could be observed. Now after we started matching
fake-overrides, we have such cases.
But creating a new ScopeSession every time is a suboptimal solution. We
need to design a scope caching KT-63773
Caused by: KT-62590
Now we have the pipeline:
1. Match declarations
2. Run checkers on matched declarations
Since the constructors with empty parameters match we only report
"checking incompatibility" about their incompatible visibility
Before the pipeline introduction, we were running matching and checking
checks together
It became possible to drop it after KT-62590. Now, on a frontend, the
return type check is part of a common AbstractExpectActualChecker logic
Change in nestedAnnotationClassViaActualTypealias.fir.kt aligns the
behaviour with K1. KT-61964
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/12750/timeline
Implement an infrastructure for checking IR before JS klib serialization.
Implement the EXPORTING_JS_NAME_CLASH and EXPORTING_JS_NAME_CLASH_ES checks.
^KT-61710 Fixed
^KT-61573 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/11969/timeline
Tests:
- MultiPlatformIntegrationTestGenerated
- CliTestGenerated
- MultiPlatformIntegrationTestGenerated
- DiagnosticTestGenerated.Multiplatform
- FirLightTreeOldFrontendDiagnosticsTestGenerated
Also add -Xexpect-actual-classes flag to all necessary ./libraries/* modules
Otherwise compilation of those modules failes because of `-Werror`
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/11039/timeline
For StrongIncompatible `actual` declaration is considered as overload
and error reports on expected declaration. For WeakIncompatible the
error is reported straight away
Before the refactoring `areCompatibleClassScopes` returned just
`Incompatible`. It is bad because StrongIncompatible isn't possible for
classes (classes can't be overloaded). Now all class incompatibilities
are weak.
The commit has a minor impact on observable behavior (cases where we
reported the compilation problems are still reported but on another
elements):
- We no longer report type parameter class incompatibilities on expect
declaration, we report them only on actuals (it happened because all
WeakIncompatible are reported only on actuals)
- In a sense, Java implicit actualization was the only way to "overload"
classes (it would be a redeclaration compilation problem, so it
doesn't count as a valid "overload"). And since type parameters
incompatibility was StrongIncompatible for classes, we counted them as
"overloads" and didn't report incompatibility problems on Kotlin
class. Now we do report. (see
implicitJavaActualization_multipleActuals)
This implementation only checks annotations set on expect/actual
declarations and requires further refinement (e.g. checking of other
annotation targets, class scopes within typealiases).
^KT-58551
Cases when default argument inhertied from super class are allowed.
Some tests for default arguments already exist and can be found in
`testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/defaultArguments`, for example
`annotationsViaActualTypeAlias.kt`.
^KT-57614 Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-10356
Merged-by: Roman Efremov <Roman.Efremov@jetbrains.com>
In K1 .isFun is always false for Java classes, so extra check
is added for that. This is not needed for K2, because .isFun is
true for all Java classes. Here it is not necessary to check
that interface has only one method, because such check will be
done in the place where interface implementation is created.
^KT-39362 Fixed
[JS] Remove incremental js jps test
[JS] Remove test of maven js archetype
[JS] Fix another one test
[JS] Fix tests for jps
[JS] Try to fix maven test data
[JS] Fix test data
[JS] Fix test data for ant
[JS] Fix jsExtraHelp test
[JS] Fix test run from not-Gradle build tools
[JS] Set flag without compiler error
[JS] Disable warnings and errors in legacy compiler called from Gradle
[JS] Proofread messages
[JS] Not proofread messages
KT-42326
- just legacy - report warning about deprecation
- both - report warning about deprecation of legacy
- no compiler explicitly chosen - error about explicit setting compiler
warn from cli legacy compiler
nowarn flag - kotlin.js.compiler.nowarn
KT-42326
KT-53074
We are going to deprecate `WITH_RUNTIME` directive. The main reason
behind this change is that `WITH_STDLIB` directive better describes
its meaning, specifically it will add kotlin stdlib to test's classpath.
Previously, the checker executed for every declaration i.e. every
declaration was considered as expect declaration. Because of that in
some cases this checker could eat 6% of compilation time.
After this commit only declarations marked with expect or actual
are checked. To achieve that, logic, that do reporting about missing
actual modifier was moved to the Actual part.
Please note, that in cases where there is no expect/actual modifier at
all other errors (like redeclaration and missing body on "actual"
declaration) would be reported.
Useful nodes:
- In this checker reportOn is always the same as
descriptor.sourceElement.ktElement. This is because the only case when
it isn't true is PropertyAccessors and they are filtered
- Annotation constructor descriptor isActual == true all the time
- previously for weak incompatible members ACTUAL_MISSING
was not reported
- the logic here is super complicated and crazy, but I don't think that
there is sense to refactor it in the old FE
Using files turned to be a bad idea, because people often
use the same name for files with expects and with corresponding actuals.
This commits disambiguiates ambiguous message for
AMBIGUOUS_ACTUALS/AMBGIUOUS_EXPECTS diagnostics by using modules instead
of files
^KT-32582 Fixed
One might think that it shouldn't be run because of 'if (declaration
!is KtNamedDeclaration) return' check in the 'check'-overload.
However, for default accessors we pass PSI for property, i.e.
KtProperty (see 'DeclarationCheckers.checkAccessors'), which
obviously passes this check
Note that we can't use `DescriptorToSourceUtils` here, because it's
returns `KtProperty` for default accessor too.
This commits adds specific check for that case, to avoid exception in
KT-28385. Ideal solution would be to either don't launch checkers on
such parameters, or explicitly declare semantic of the
'declaration'-parameter, e.g. to rename it to 'reportOn' (see KT-28403
for discussion)
^KT-28385 Fixed
Nikita Bobko