^KT-58346 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/9967
BTW this commit accidentaly and partially fixes KT-57553 for K2, because
of a cleaner K2 architecture. I will unify MUST_BE_INITIALIZED behaviour
in K1 and K2 in the next commits
- Mangled names of property accessors now include context receiver
types of the corresponding property when computed from FIR.
- Context receivers are now supported when computing mangled names
from IR
- IrBasedDescriptors now account for context receivers
^KT-57435 Fixed
The reason #1 for this feature is that we want to test IdSignatures
generated for declarations. Currently, there is no (easy) way to ensure
that a change in the signature building logic doesn't cause any breaking
changes wrt klibs.
Now, most IdSignatures include hashed mangled names in them, so even if
we catch a regression where the included hash changes, there would be no
way of knowing immediately what caused it, unless we'd also have mangled
names in the expectations.
The reason #2 is to test the manglers themselves. Currently, there are
no tests for them. They heavily duplicate each other, this is already
causing issues (see KT-57427) that would be very hard to catch without
these tests.
^KT-58238 Fixed
The test is not in any way JVM-specific, but it fails on the JS BE
because of different fq-names of stdlib symbols on JVM and JS.
The fix is in progress. Mute the test until the fix is ready.
Before this commit, for property candidates in K2 their types wasn't
inferred/susbtituted properly.
So, when candidate for fooBar.liveLoaded.invoke() was created,
the type of `fooBar.liveLoaded` was just X type parameter for which
there is no any `bar()` functions in its member scope.
While proposed semantics is a bit different from K1, where
both property and invoke candidates are united into common system,
it doesn't contradict to the specification (https://kotlinlang.org/spec/overload-resolution.html#callables-and-invoke-convention)
which says explicitly that invoke-convention should be desugared as
`r.foo.invoke()`, thus `r.foo` should be completed independently.
Also, this strategy supports some reasonable use-cases like KT-58259
while it's still a breaking change but for more artificial-looking
situations (see KT-58260) and should be passed through
the language committee.
The changes in stubTypeReceiverRestriction* tests looks consistent
because of how `genericLambda` now works
(with full completion of property call).
NB: The code is going to be red once KT-54667 is fixed and also there's
already similar diagnostic in K1 (INFERRED_INTO_DECLARED_UPPER_BOUNDS)
^KT-58142 Fixed
^KT-58259 Fixed
^KT-58260 Related
Use the same condition as in the already existing `createIrEnumEntry`
function (and as in psi2ir): enum class should be final unless there's
an enum entry with any declaration other than its constructor.
#KT-57216
Sometimes when running MPP tests we may
observe js-specific modules running with
the jvm-specific fir2ir converter
(probably because the name didn't contain
the JVM affix).
In this example we get 2 variants of `kotlin/toString()`:
one coming from the KLib provider, and the
other coming from the builtins provider.
These are identical deserialized functions.
^KT-57601 Fixed
Value parameters annotations are now handled consistently in
factory functions creating this IrValueParameter instances.
In before, it was handled in several different places, which leads to
being sometimes lost, e.g. in LazyFirSimpleFunction.
This caused original problem in interop checks.
^KT-58099
The changes to the irText test data result in the fact that we
now unconditionally unwrap substitution overrides of delegation targets
whereas before we built an unsubstituted scope of the type we delegate
to. If we delegate to a class A : B<C>, the unsubstituted scope of
A can still contain substitution overrides for inherited generic methods
from B<T> that we didn't unwrap before but do unwrap now.
#KT-57899 Fixed
The constructor with the required parameters may
not have been defined, and since JS/IR box tests
pass, it seems, we don't have to resolve
into anything meaningful. We could generate
the appropriate constructor like dynamic type
members are generated, but, again, K1 IR doesn't
even contain a delegating constructor call.
^KT-57809 Fixed
tl;dr the current design of klibs does not allow to properly deserialize
the list of sealed subclasses in a sound way. It is possible that
a subclass of a sealed class is declared in a different file, AND is
private in that file.
A more detailed explanation:
Right now we don't serialize file signatures at all.
However, a private declaration's signature must necessarily include
the file signature.
How do we serialize a private declaration's signature into a klib
and deserialize it later?
**Serialization** is simple: we just serialize the file signature as
an empty protobuf message.
When we are **deserializing** a private declaration, we look at the file
that is being deserialized right now, and construct the file signature
based on that.
This logic, however, doesn't always work. An example is KT-54028.
Basically, if we have a sealed interface with a private implementor
declared in a different file, this breaks:
1. We are deserializing the sealed interface. The deserializer knows
that we are now in the file in which the sealed interface is declared.
2. As part of deserializing the interface, we deserialize its sealed
subclasses.
3. Naturally, we come to deserializing the private implementor that is
declared in another file, but the deserializer still thinks that we are
in the file in which the interface is declared. A wrong signature is
created, which leads to linkage failure.
We *could* fix this by properly serializing the file signature,
i.e. instead of an empty protobuf message we could write the file path
and its package to the klib. However, there a problems with this
approach:
- The current design of signatures allows a situation where two
different files can have the same relative path
(for example, with the help of the `-Xklib-relative-path-base` compiler
flag) *and* the same package, which would introduce ambiguity during
linkage.
- Most importantly, this appoach won't work well with incremental
compilation of klibs. Currently we rely on the assumption that all
cross-file references are handled with public signatures, and private
signatures are only used inside a single file. This allows to move
declarations across files without recompiling it's use sites.
It has been decided to apply the following hacky solution: we just don't
deserialize the list of sealed subclasses from klibs.
The list of sealed subclasses is not used in lowerings, so it should be
safe.
#KT-54028 Fixed
The only case when behavior is change is described at
computeNonTrivialTypeArgumentForScopeSubstitutor
The idea is to avoid depending on the presence of @UnsafeVariance
and instead approximate captured types in covariant argument positions
before building substitution scopes
It's correct because for Captured(*) <: Supertype,
Out<Captured(*)> <: Out<Supertype> and when we've got @UnsafeVariance
value parameters at Out, it's ok to allow passing Supertype there.
^KT-57602 Fixed
^KT-54894 Fixed
Nikita Bobko